Name: Mike There is confusion in the provided text; Tom is mentioned, but the text does not provide any straightforward information about Tom's height relative to Jack or Mike. To accurately answer, let me clarify the information from the text. - Jack < Jill - Jill < Sarah - Jack = Mike No clear information about Tom's height. It appears to state that Jill is taller than Tom. Therefore, for Tom to be the tallest, he'd have had to be the identical height to Sarah (taller than Jill and Jack). I can't conclude from the information provided that Tom is an option, since it is ambiguous and inconsistent. Overall, the information does not allow for a valid conclusion that Tom is the tallest. So we have four clear order options: - Jack (smallest) - Mike - Jill - Sarah (tallest) The only tallest person mentioned is Sarah. Even though Mike's and Jack's actual height is undoubtedly tied to Jill's and Sarah's heights, without the specific number information, the tallest individual we know is while Sarah's height could be unknown, the fact that she is described as being the taller than Jill (who is taller than Tom) convinces that she is much taller than Jill, maybe even over 2 meters, and in contrast, Jack is also on that shorter end, thus the clear winner would be Sarah as the tallest.