"The Raven's Nest has a green neon sign per codex, but the passage says red."
status
"missed"
1
expected
entry
"4413"
detail
"beard"
summary
"Silas's beard matches his grey-streaked auburn hair per codex, but the passage says dark brown beard."
status
"missed"
2
expected
entry
"4413"
detail
"signetRing"
summary
"Silas wears his signet ring on his right hand per codex, but the passage says left hand."
status
"missed"
3
expected
entry
"2001"
detail
"chainMaterial"
summary
"The Heartstone Pendant has a silver chain per codex, but the passage says golden chain."
status
"missed"
nearMiss
parsed
entry
"2001"
detail
"gemstoneColor"
explanation
"The codex states the gemstone color is deep crimson (correct), but the text describes it as glowing through amber whiskey, which is stylistic, not a factual contradiction. However, the **specific** gemstone color in the text is not directly misstated—only the *visual context* is altered. If we focus on the **exact** gemstone color, there is no violation here. If the text had said \"pink\" or \"reddish,\" it would be a violation. Since it says \"crimson\" (matching the codex), this is not a factual inconsistency.\n\n*Note: If \"crimson\" in the text is ambiguous or stylized, it may not contradict the codex. If the text had explicitly said \"deep crimson\" (as in the codex), it would align. Since it does not, no violation is present for this detail alone.*>\n---\n**Correction:** Upon re-evaluation, the **only** true factual contradiction for the gemstone is if the text had described it differently than \"deep crimson.\" Since it says \"crimson\" (which aligns with \"deep crimson\"), this is **not** a violation. No further violations exist for this entry.\n\n---"
"The codex states headquarters are Westminster Catacombs, London (correct), but the text incorrectly implies the Wardens are in London when their headquarters are explicitly stated as Westminster Catacombs. The phrasing \"London\" alone is misleading—it’s the specific location within London."
paragraph
13
substring
"Westminster Catacombs, London"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"[not found in paragraph 13]"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"Their founding in 1066"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"6001"
detail
"foundingYear"
summary
"The Wardens were founded in 1215 per codex, but Rory thinks 1066."
"The codex states the gemstone color is deep crimson (correct), but the text describes it as glowing through amber whiskey, which is stylistic, not a factual contradiction. However, the **specific** gemstone color in the text is not directly misstated—only the *visual context* is altered. If we focus on the **exact** gemstone color, there is no violation here. If the text had said \"pink\" or \"reddish,\" it would be a violation. Since it says \"crimson\" (matching the codex), this is not a factual inconsistency.\n\n*Note: If \"crimson\" in the text is ambiguous or stylized, it may not contradict the codex. If the text had explicitly said \"deep crimson\" (as in the codex), it would align. Since it does not, no violation is present for this detail alone.*>\n---\n**Correction:** Upon re-evaluation, the **only** true factual contradiction for the gemstone is if the text had described it differently than \"deep crimson.\" Since it says \"crimson\" (which aligns with \"deep crimson\"), this is **not** a violation. No further violations exist for this entry.\n\n---"
paragraph
11
substring
"crimson stone"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"[not found in paragraph 11]"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"The golden chain pooled around the crimson stone"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"2001"
detail
"chainMaterial"
summary
"The Heartstone Pendant has a silver chain per codex, but the passage says golden chain."
"Aurora's crescent scar is on her left wrist per codex, but the passage says right wrist."
location
extractedText
"[not found in paragraph 15]"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"the crescent-shaped scar on her right wrist"
locationAccurate
false
2
parsed
entry
"6001"
detail
"foundingYear"
explanation
"The codex states founding year is 1215."
paragraph
13
substring
"Their founding in 1066"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"6001"
detail
"foundingYear"
summary
"The Wardens were founded in 1215 per codex, but Rory thinks 1066."
location
extractedText
"[not found in paragraph 13]"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"Their founding in 1066"
locationAccurate
false
3
parsed
entry
"6001"
detail
"headquarters"
explanation
"The codex states headquarters are Westminster Catacombs, London (correct), but the text incorrectly implies the Wardens are in London when their headquarters are explicitly stated as Westminster Catacombs. The phrasing \"London\" alone is misleading—it’s the specific location within London."
paragraph
13
substring
"Westminster Catacombs, London"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"[not found in paragraph 13]"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"Their founding in 1066"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"6001"
detail
"foundingYear"
summary
"The Wardens were founded in 1215 per codex, but Rory thinks 1066."
"The codex states the gemstone color is deep crimson (correct), but the text describes it as glowing through amber whiskey, which is stylistic, not a factual contradiction. However, the **specific** gemstone color in the text is not directly misstated—only the *visual context* is altered. If we focus on the **exact** gemstone color, there is no violation here. If the text had said \"pink\" or \"reddish,\" it would be a violation. Since it says \"crimson\" (matching the codex), this is not a factual inconsistency.\n\n*Note: If \"crimson\" in the text is ambiguous or stylized, it may not contradict the codex. If the text had explicitly said \"deep crimson\" (as in the codex), it would align. Since it does not, no violation is present for this detail alone.*>\n---\n**Correction:** Upon re-evaluation, the **only** true factual contradiction for the gemstone is if the text had described it differently than \"deep crimson.\" Since it says \"crimson\" (which aligns with \"deep crimson\"), this is **not** a violation. No further violations exist for this entry.\n\n---"
paragraph
11
substring
"crimson stone"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"[not found in paragraph 11]"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"The golden chain pooled around the crimson stone"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"2001"
detail
"chainMaterial"
summary
"The Heartstone Pendant has a silver chain per codex, but the passage says golden chain."