"The text implies Silas limps on his right leg or ambulates generally, but the codex specifies he has a slight limp in his *left* leg. The description of him limping around the counter could be ambiguous, but without specifying the correct side, it risks misrepresentation; however, since \"limped\" alone isn't contradictory unless side is implied incorrectly, this may not be a full violation. But given precise codex entry, movement described generically *could* be acceptable — pending interpretation. However, as written, no explicit contradiction of the *side* occurs here — so no violation on side. But wait — no: it doesn't contradict the side, so actually no violation. Re-evaluating: the codex says \"left leg\", and the text just says \"limped\" — that's consistent. So this is not a violation. Therefore, remove this.\n\nWait: correction — no violation for limp side because no contradictory detail given. Only that he limped — which is consistent.\n\nBut now, new issue:"
paragraph
2
substring
"limped around to her side"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"limped around to her side"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"his dark brown beard"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"4413"
detail
"beard"
summary
"Silas's beard matches his grey-streaked auburn hair per codex, but the passage says dark brown beard."
"The text implies Silas limps on his right leg or ambulates generally, but the codex specifies he has a slight limp in his *left* leg. The description of him limping around the counter could be ambiguous, but without specifying the correct side, it risks misrepresentation; however, since \"limped\" alone isn't contradictory unless side is implied incorrectly, this may not be a full violation. But given precise codex entry, movement described generically *could* be acceptable — pending interpretation. However, as written, no explicit contradiction of the *side* occurs here — so no violation on side. But wait — no: it doesn't contradict the side, so actually no violation. Re-evaluating: the codex says \"left leg\", and the text just says \"limped\" — that's consistent. So this is not a violation. Therefore, remove this.\n\nWait: correction — no violation for limp side because no contradictory detail given. Only that he limped — which is consistent.\n\nBut now, new issue:"
paragraph
2
substring
"limped around to her side"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"limped around to her side"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"his dark brown beard"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"4413"
detail
"beard"
summary
"Silas's beard matches his grey-streaked auburn hair per codex, but the passage says dark brown beard."