"The Veil Compass face is etched with sigils per the codex, but the passage says the face is smooth and unmarked."
status
"matched"
matchedBy
entry
"2004"
detail
"faceMarkings"
explanation
"The text says the compass face is smooth and unmarked, but the codex says it is etched with protective sigils."
paragraph
6
substring
"glass face smooth and unmarked"
location
extractedText
"glass face smooth and unmarked"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"its glass face smooth and unmarked"
locationAccurate
true
falsePositiveDetails
0
parsed
entry
"4419"
detail
"walkingStick"
explanation
"The text refers to a generic cane, while the codex specifies she uses a blackthorn walking stick (minor, but \"cane\" vs \"walking stick\" might be stylistic; however, the next violation is clear). NOTE: I will skip this as \"cane\" and \"walking stick\" are often synonymous unless specified otherwise. Let's look for harder contradictions. Ah, the location of the Crimson Court base is a better hit."
paragraph
4
substring
"tapped her cane"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"tapped her cane"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"her keen green eyes"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"4419"
detail
"eyeColor"
summary
"Maggie has sharp grey eyes per the codex, but the passage says green eyes."
"The text associates the gauntlet (an Irathi item) with Abaddon correctly, but the merchant claims it is from Dymas in the previous sentence. However, the specific violation here is the merchant claiming the *gauntlet* is from Dymas while invoking Abaddon (ruler of Irath). The primary error is the origin stated in the previous sentence. Let's re-evaluate the \"Prince Abaddon\" line. If the merchant says \"Straight from Dymas... Prince Abaddon's finest work\", they are conflating the realms. Abaddon rules Irath, not Dymas. The codex says Abaddon rules Irath. The text implies Abaddon is associated with the item coming from Dymas. This is a contradiction of the ruler/realm association.\nActually, the text says \"Straight from Dymas,\" then \"Prince Abaddon's finest work.\" Since Abaddon rules Irath (not Dymas), and the Gauntlet is from Irath (not Dymas), the statement \"Straight from Dymas\" is the main lie/error. The mention of Abaddon is correct for the item, but incorrect for the stated location Dymas.\nLet's stick to the clear contradictions found."
paragraph
5
substring
"Prince Abaddon's finest work"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"Prince Abaddon's finest work"
inBounds
true
expectedText
""
locationAccurate
true
76.9231%
Precision
True positives: 10/13
totalReported
13
truePositives
10
reportedDetails
0
parsed
entry
"856"
detail
"currentLocation"
explanation
"The text states the market is in Shoreditch, but the codex says it is beneath Camden."
paragraph
1
substring
"abandoned Tube station beneath Shoreditch"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"856"
detail
"currentLocation"
summary
"The Veil Market is beneath Camden per the codex, but the passage says Shoreditch."
location
extractedText
"abandoned Tube station beneath Shoreditch"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"the abandoned Tube station beneath Shoreditch"
locationAccurate
true
1
parsed
entry
"4418"
detail
"eyeColor"
explanation
"The text says Nyx has blue eyes, but the codex says they have faintly glowing violet eyes."
paragraph
1
substring
"glowing blue eyes"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"4418"
detail
"eyeColor"
summary
"Nyx has violet eyes per the codex, but the passage says blue eyes."
location
extractedText
"glowing blue eyes"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"their glowing blue eyes"
locationAccurate
true
2
parsed
entry
"4417"
detail
"scar"
explanation
"The text says the scar is on the right forearm, but the codex says it is on the left forearm."
paragraph
2
substring
"scarred right forearm"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"4417"
detail
"scar"
summary
"Tomás has a scar on his left forearm per the codex, but the passage says right forearm."
location
extractedText
"scarred right forearm"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"his scarred right forearm"
locationAccurate
true
3
parsed
entry
"4417"
detail
"birthplace"
explanation
"The text implies Tomás is from Madrid (via accent), but the codex says he was born in Seville, Spain."
paragraph
2
substring
"Madrid accent"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"4417"
detail
"birthplace"
summary
"Tomás was born in Seville per the codex, but the passage implies Madrid via his accent."
location
extractedText
"Madrid accent"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"his Madrid accent"
locationAccurate
true
4
parsed
entry
"4420"
detail
"hair"
explanation
"The text says Kai has natural black hair, but the codex says his hair is dyed electric-blue."
paragraph
3
substring
"natural black hair"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"4420"
detail
"hair"
summary
"Kai has dyed electric-blue hair per the codex, but the passage says natural black hair."
location
extractedText
"natural black hair"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"His natural black hair"
locationAccurate
true
5
parsed
entry
"4419"
detail
"eyeColor"
explanation
"The text says Maggie has green eyes, but the codex says she has sharp grey eyes."
paragraph
4
substring
"keen green eyes"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"4419"
detail
"eyeColor"
summary
"Maggie has sharp grey eyes per the codex, but the passage says green eyes."
location
extractedText
"keen green eyes"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"her keen green eyes"
locationAccurate
true
6
parsed
entry
"4419"
detail
"walkingStick"
explanation
"The text refers to a generic cane, while the codex specifies she uses a blackthorn walking stick (minor, but \"cane\" vs \"walking stick\" might be stylistic; however, the next violation is clear). NOTE: I will skip this as \"cane\" and \"walking stick\" are often synonymous unless specified otherwise. Let's look for harder contradictions. Ah, the location of the Crimson Court base is a better hit."
paragraph
4
substring
"tapped her cane"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"tapped her cane"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"her keen green eyes"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"4419"
detail
"eyeColor"
summary
"Maggie has sharp grey eyes per the codex, but the passage says green eyes."
"The text claims the gauntlet is from Dymas, but the codex says its origin is Irath."
paragraph
5
substring
"Straight from Dymas"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"2003"
detail
"origin"
summary
"The Irathi War Gauntlet is from Irath per the codex, but the merchant says it's from Dymas."
location
extractedText
"Straight from Dymas"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"Straight from Dymas"
locationAccurate
true
11
parsed
entry
"857"
detail
"ruler"
explanation
"The text associates the gauntlet (an Irathi item) with Abaddon correctly, but the merchant claims it is from Dymas in the previous sentence. However, the specific violation here is the merchant claiming the *gauntlet* is from Dymas while invoking Abaddon (ruler of Irath). The primary error is the origin stated in the previous sentence. Let's re-evaluate the \"Prince Abaddon\" line. If the merchant says \"Straight from Dymas... Prince Abaddon's finest work\", they are conflating the realms. Abaddon rules Irath, not Dymas. The codex says Abaddon rules Irath. The text implies Abaddon is associated with the item coming from Dymas. This is a contradiction of the ruler/realm association.\nActually, the text says \"Straight from Dymas,\" then \"Prince Abaddon's finest work.\" Since Abaddon rules Irath (not Dymas), and the Gauntlet is from Irath (not Dymas), the statement \"Straight from Dymas\" is the main lie/error. The mention of Abaddon is correct for the item, but incorrect for the stated location Dymas.\nLet's stick to the clear contradictions found."
paragraph
5
substring
"Prince Abaddon's finest work"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"Prince Abaddon's finest work"
inBounds
true
expectedText
""
locationAccurate
true
12
parsed
entry
"2004"
detail
"faceMarkings"
explanation
"The text says the compass face is smooth and unmarked, but the codex says it is etched with protective sigils."
paragraph
6
substring
"glass face smooth and unmarked"
status
"true_positive"
matchedExpected
entry
"2004"
detail
"faceMarkings"
summary
"The Veil Compass face is etched with sigils per the codex, but the passage says the face is smooth and unmarked."