Run: 2026-02-21-01KJ163BGF9TYGKBDF1RW6ZZZA

Run Details

Model:: Qwen 3.5 Plus (2026-02-15)
Test:: Codex Red Herring (False Positive Detection)
Scenario:: Short text (~524 words), big codex (51 entries)
Duration:: 1m 14s
Cost:: $0.013915
Provider:: Alibaba

Evaluation summary

Score	Evaluator	Details Link
0.00%	Correct "no violations" response	(details)
20.00%	No hallucinated violations	(details)
10.0000%	Overall

Model input

System

You are a meticulous continuity editor for a fiction project. You have access to a "story bible" (codex) containing canonical details about characters, locations, items, lore, and organizations.

Your task: Given the codex and a prose text, identify every factual inconsistency between the text and the codex. A violation is any detail in the text that contradicts what the codex states — wrong eye color, wrong location name, wrong ruler, swapped left/right, incorrect dates, etc.

Be thorough. Check every named entity, physical description, location detail, date, title, and relationship mentioned in the text against the codex. Do not flag stylistic choices, omissions, or things not covered by the codex — only flag direct contradictions.

For each violation found, output an XML element with the following attributes:
- entry: the codex entry ID that is contradicted
- detail: which specific detail is wrong — use the exact name of the codex element or attribute that is contradicted (e.g. "eyeColor", "species", "ruler", "material")
- paragraph: the 1-indexed paragraph number containing the violation
- substring: the exact substring from the text that contains the violation

The element body should contain a brief explanation of the contradiction.

Example format:
<violation entry="1234" detail="hairColor" paragraph="2" substring="her brown hair flowing">The text says brown hair, but the codex says blonde.</violation>

If you find no violations, output: <violations-none/>

Output ONLY the violation XML elements. Do not include any other text, preamble, or explanation outside the XML.

User/Human

<codex>
<character id="100" name="Torben Reikhart" aliases="Stray">
  <gender>Male</gender>
  <eyeColor>Green</eyeColor>
  <hairColor>Silver</hairColor>
</character>

<character id="101" name="Sable Dunmore">
  <species>Human</species>
  <gender>Female</gender>
  <age>28</age>
  <eyeColor>Brown</eyeColor>
  <hairColor>Auburn</hairColor>
</character>

<character id="102" name="Old Rivka">
  <gender>Female</gender>
</character>

<character id="103" name="Petal Dunmore">
  <gender>Female</gender>
</character>

<character id="104" name="Jurren Dunmore">
  <gender>Male</gender>
</character>

<character id="111" name="Grunn Tetch" aliases="Old Tetch">
  <species>Dwarf</species>
  <gender>Male</gender>
  <eyeColor>Amber</eyeColor>
  <hairColor>Gray</hairColor>
</character>

<character id="112" name="Dol Tetch">
  <gender>Male</gender>
</character>

<character id="113" name="Amma">
  <gender>Female</gender>
</character>

<character id="124" name="Iselda Moth">
  <gender>Female</gender>
  <eyeColor>Violet</eyeColor>
  <hairColor>White</hairColor>
</character>

<character id="125" name="Brother Hemmen" aliases="the Eyeless">
  <species>Human</species>
  <gender>Male</gender>
  <hairColor>White</hairColor>
</character>

<character id="136" name="Osrik Pallengrave" aliases="the Pale">
  <species>Tiefling</species>
  <gender>Male</gender>
  <eyeColor>Red</eyeColor>
  <hairColor>Black</hairColor>
</character>

<character id="137" name="Queen Veredine" aliases="Veredine the Undying">
  <species>Elf</species>
  <gender>Female</gender>
</character>

<character id="138" name="Wren Hessik">
  <gender>Female</gender>
</character>

<character id="139" name="Captain Mettik">
  <species>Human</species>
  <gender>Male</gender>
</character>

<character id="114" name="Mettik"/>

<location id="105" name="The Rusty Lantern"/>

<location id="106" name="Dunmore">
  <terrain>Coastal</terrain>
</location>

<location id="115" name="The Thornveil" aliases="the Veil">
  <terrain>Forest</terrain>
  <climate>Temperate</climate>
</location>

<location id="116" name="Kettlebridge"/>

<location id="117" name="Port Gessik"/>

<location id="126" name="The Hollow"/>

<location id="127" name="The Fathom Stair"/>

<location id="128" name="Moth Hall"/>

<location id="140" name="The Spire of Echoes">
  <terrain>Mountain</terrain>
</location>

<location id="141" name="The Sanctum"/>

<location id="142" name="Hatchwell"/>

<item id="107" name="Kindling">
  <material>Dark iron</material>
  <objectType>Weapon</objectType>
  <power>Fire</power>
</item>

<item id="108" name="Petal's Locket">
  <material>Silver</material>
  <objectType>Jewelry</objectType>
</item>

<item id="118" name="Burden">
  <material>Bone and iron</material>
  <objectType>Weapon</objectType>
  <power>Light</power>
</item>

<item id="119" name="The Little Stoneman">
  <material>Soapstone</material>
</item>

<item id="120" name="Amma's Ring" aliases="Silver Ring, Silver Band">
  <material>Silver</material>
  <objectType>Jewelry</objectType>
</item>

<item id="129" name="The Pale Compass">
  <material>Brass</material>
</item>

<item id="130" name="The Verity Beads">
  <material>Bone</material>
</item>

<item id="131" name="The Unfinished Hymnal">
  <material>Vellum</material>
</item>

<item id="143" name="Harrowglass" aliases="the Hungering Edge">
  <material>Obsidian</material>
  <objectType>Weapon</objectType>
  <power>Void</power>
</item>

<item id="144" name="The Warden's Mail">
  <material>Silver chain</material>
  <objectType>Armor</objectType>
  <power>Light</power>
</item>

<item id="145" name="Nightbell">
  <material>Bronze</material>
</item>

<lore id="109" name="The Felling">
  <timePeriod>Two centuries ago</timePeriod>
  <category>War</category>
</lore>

<lore id="110" name="The Kindling Rite">
  <category>Tradition</category>
</lore>

<lore id="121" name="The Thornborn"/>

<lore id="122" name="Root-tongue">
  <category>Language</category>
</lore>

<lore id="123" name="Greenveil">
  <category>Tradition</category>
</lore>

<lore id="132" name="The Binding of Reshkai">
  <timePeriod>The First Age</timePeriod>
  <category>Magic</category>
</lore>

<lore id="133" name="The Order of the Closed Eye">
  <category>Religion</category>
</lore>

<lore id="134" name="The Ashfall"/>

<lore id="135" name="The First Age">
  <category>History</category>
</lore>

<lore id="146" name="The Riven War">
  <timePeriod>A thousand years before the Felling</timePeriod>
  <category>War</category>
</lore>

<lore id="147" name="The Watcher's Prophecy">
  <category>Prophecy</category>
</lore>

<lore id="148" name="The Tithe of Echoes">
  <category>Tradition</category>
</lore>

<lore id="149" name="The Pallid Host"/>
</codex>

<text>
The Rusty Lantern sat crooked on its foundations, listing toward the harbor like a drunk leaning on a post. Salt had eaten into the planks years ago and no one had bothered to replace them. The ceiling beams were black with smoke. Behind the bar, Old Rivka wiped the same glass she'd been wiping for the last quarter hour, watching the door with the patience of someone who had outlived most of her regulars.

The door opened and a man stepped through, shaking rain from his silver hair. Water dripped from his coat onto the warped floorboards and pooled in the grooves between planks. His green eyes swept the room — the fishermen hunched over their cups, the candle guttering in its sconce, the woman sitting alone at the corner table. He smelled of wet wool and the cold air off the harbor. Old Rivka raised her chin. "Stray," she called across the room. "Didn't think you'd show." He didn't answer. He crossed to the corner table, his boots leaving damp prints on the wood, and sat down across from the woman waiting there.

Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight years old, human, and tired of waiting. Auburn hair fell past her shoulders, pushed back from brown eyes that tracked Torben Reikhart as he settled into the chair opposite her. On the table between them lay a sword — Kindling, she called it. A dark iron blade, the metal faintly warm even in the chill of the tavern. If you watched closely you could see it: the barest shimmer of fire running along the edge, thin as a hair. At her neck hung a silver locket. Petal's Locket, though she never called it that aloud. "It still has her hair inside," she said, touching it once. "That's all I have left of her."

Torben waited. He'd learned when to be quiet.

"My sister Petal," Sable said. "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore. You know what that was — the war that broke everything along the coast two centuries ago. Jurren — our father — he told me to take Petal and run. I did. She didn't make it."

Torben didn't ask the obvious question. Twenty-eight years old and human, but she spoke of a war two centuries gone as though she'd stood in the middle of it. The locket at her throat gave a single, faint pulse — a glow so brief he might have imagined it — and then was still.

Sable's hand moved to the locket again. "We couldn't give her a Kindling Rite. You know the tradition? You burn the dead with what they loved. Their tools. Their letters. You give it all to the fire so they carry it onward. But there was no body to burn. Nothing left of her but this locket and whatever I can remember." She looked at Torben. "Dunmore — port village on the salt cliffs — there's nothing left of that either. Just rock and old foundations."

Torben said, "Then we'd better make it count."

Sable picked up Kindling and sheathed it. They left the Rusty Lantern without another word. The rain had stopped. The air outside was sharp and clean, carrying the smell of salt and wet stone from the harbor. Somewhere down the waterfront a shutter banged in the wind. Old Rivka set the glass down, held it up to the dim light for a moment as if checking her own reflection, then reached for another.
</text>

Identify all factual violations in the text above that contradict the codex.

Model response

<violation entry="100" detail="hairColor" paragraph="2" substring="shaking rain from his silver hair">The text says Torben has silver hair, but the codex states his hair color is Silver. Wait, re-reading codex: Torben Reikhart hairColor is "Silver". Text says "silver hair". This is a match. Let me re-evaluate.</violation>

Wait, I made a mistake in my thought process. Let me re-check the codex carefully against the text.

Codex Character 100 (Torben Reikhart):
- eyeColor: Green
- hairColor: Silver

Text Paragraph 2:
- "silver hair" -> Matches Codex.
- "green eyes" -> Matches Codex.

Codex Character 101 (Sable Dunmore):
- species: Human
- age: 28
- eyeColor: Brown
- hairColor: Auburn

Text Paragraph 3:
- "Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight years old" -> Matches.
- "human" -> Matches.
- "Auburn hair" -> Matches.
- "brown eyes" -> Matches.

Codex Item 107 (Kindling):
- material: Dark iron
- power: Fire

Text Paragraph 3:
- "Kindling... A dark iron blade" -> Matches.
- "shimmer of fire" -> Matches power.

Codex Item 108 (Petal's Locket):
- material: Silver

Text Paragraph 3:
- "silver locket" -> Matches.

Codex Lore 109 (The Felling):
- timePeriod: Two centuries ago
- category: War

Text Paragraph 5:
- "The Felling... war... two centuries ago" -> Matches.

Codex Location 106 (Dunmore):
- terrain: Coastal

Text Paragraph 6:
- "Dunmore — port village on the salt cliffs" -> Matches coastal.

Let me re-read the prompt's codex and text very carefully to ensure I didn't miss a subtle contradiction.

Codex 100: Torben Reikhart, hairColor: **Silver**.
Text: "shaking rain from his **silver** hair." (Match)

Codex 101: Sable Dunmore, age: **28**.
Text: "Sable Dunmore was **twenty-eight** years old". (Match)

Codex 109: The Felling, timePeriod: **Two centuries ago**.
Text: "war... **two centuries ago**". (Match)

Is there a contradiction regarding the "Kindling Rite"?
Codex 110: The Kindling Rite, category: Tradition.
Text: "You know the tradition? You burn the dead with what they loved." (Matches category).

Is there a contradiction regarding the locket content?
Codex 108: Petal's Locket, material: Silver. No mention of contents.
Text: "It still has her hair inside". (Not a contradiction, just extra detail).

Let me check the location "The Rusty Lantern".
Codex 105: The Rusty Lantern.
Text: "The Rusty Lantern sat crooked". (Match).

Let me check the characters' genders.
Torben: Male. Text: "man", "He". (Match).
Sable: Female. Text: "woman", "She". (Match).
Old Rivka: Female. Text: "her", "she". (Match).

Let me check the item "Kindling" again.
Codex: material "Dark iron".
Text: "dark iron blade". (Match).

Let me check the item "Petal's Locket".
Codex: material "Silver".
Text: "silver locket". (Match).

Wait, did I miss something about the *nature* of the Felling or the timeline?
Sable is 28. The Felling was 200 years ago.
Text: "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore."
If Sable is 28 now, and the Felling was 200 years ago, she could not have been 14 during the Felling unless she is immortal or the timeline is impossible for a human.
Codex 101 says Sable is **Human** and **28** years old.
Codex 109 says The Felling was **Two centuries ago** (200 years).
Text says: "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore."
If she was 14 then, and it was 200 years ago, she would be 214 years old. But the codex says she is 28 and Human.
This is a logical contradiction based on the codex data points.

Violation 1:
Entry: 101 (Sable Dunmore) or 109 (The Felling)?
The contradiction is between Sable's age/species and the event time.
The text claims she was 14 during an event 200 years ago.
Codex says she is 28 and Human.
The specific detail contradicted is likely the **age** or the implicit timeline derived from **species** (Human lifespan) vs the **timePeriod** of the lore.
However, the instruction asks for "which specific detail is wrong — use the exact name of the codex element or attribute".
The text asserts a history for Sable that makes her age (28) impossible if the Felling was 200 years ago.
The text says: "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore."
This implies Sable's age should be ~214.
Codex 101 says `age`: "28".
So the text contradicts the `age` attribute of entry 101.
Or, does it contradict the `timePeriod` of entry 109? No, the text agrees it was 200 years ago.
Does it contradict `species`? If she were an Elf, maybe. But she is Human.
The most direct contradiction is that the narrative constructed in the text renders the codex `age` of "28" impossible.
Actually, the text *states* "Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight years old" in paragraph 3.
Then in paragraph 5, it says "She was fourteen when The Felling... two centuries ago".
These two statements within the text are contradictory to each other given the codex confirmation of the Felling's date.
But the task is to find inconsistencies *between the text and the codex*.
Codex: Sable is 28. Felling was 200 years ago.
Text: Sable is 28. Felling was 200 years ago. Sable was 14 at the time of the Felling.
The statement "She was fourteen when The Felling..." contradicts the mathematical reality established by the codex entries for Sable's age and the Felling's date.
Which entry does it violate? It violates the biological reality of entry 101 (Human, 28).
If I have to pick one, the statement "She was fourteen when The Felling..." creates a false history for character 101.
Let's look for other potential errors first.

Re-reading Codex 100: Torben Reikhart.
Aliases: Stray.
Text: "Stray," she called... (Match).

Re-reading Codex 107: Kindling.
Power: Fire.
Text: "shimmer of fire". (Match).

Re-reading Codex 108: Petal's Locket.
Text: "Petal's Locket". (Match).

Is there any other character?
Jurren Dunmore (104). Text: "Jurren — our father". (Match).
Petal Dunmore (103). Text: "My sister Petal". (Match).

Let's reconsider the Sable age issue.
The text explicitly states: "Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight years old".
Then later: "She was fourteen when The Felling... two centuries ago".
If the Felling was 200 years ago, and she was 14, she is 214.
The codex says she is 28.
The text *contains* the correct age (28) but then *contradicts* it with the backstory.
Is the violation the substring "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore"?
Yes. This substring implies an age of ~214, which contradicts the codex `age` of "28" for entry 101.
Also, since she is `species`: "Human", living 200 years is also a contradiction of species norms, but the `age` attribute is the explicit numerical contradiction.

Are there any others?
"Dunmore — port village on the salt cliffs".
Codex 106: Dunmore, terrain: "Coastal".
"Port village on salt cliffs" fits "Coastal". No violation.

"Old Rivka". Codex 102. Gender Female. Text uses "her", "she". No violation.

"Kindling... dark iron blade". Codex 107: material "Dark iron". No violation.

"Petal's Locket... silver locket". Codex 108: material "Silver". No violation.

"The Felling... war... two centuries ago". Codex 109: timePeriod "Two centuries ago", category "War". No violation.

"Kindling Rite... tradition". Codex 110: category "Tradition". No violation.

Is it possible I missed a physical description?
Torben: Green eyes, Silver hair. Text: Green eyes, Silver hair.
Sable: Brown eyes, Auburn hair. Text: Brown eyes, Auburn hair.

What about "The Rusty Lantern"?
Codex 105. Name matches.

What about "Stray"?
Codex 100 alias. Matches.

Is there a violation with "Jurren"?
Codex 104: Jurren Dunmore, Gender Male.
Text: "Jurren — our father". Father implies Male. Matches.

Is there a violation with "Petal"?
Codex 103: Petal Dunmore, Gender Female.
Text: "My sister Petal". Sister implies Female. Matches. "She was fourteen". She implies Female. Matches.

Okay, the only substantial contradiction is the timeline of Sable's life relative to The Felling.
The text asserts she was 14 during an event 200 years ago.
Codex asserts she is 28.
This is a direct contradiction of the `age` attribute in entry 101.
The substring is "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore".
The explanation is that if the Felling was two centuries ago (per codex lore 109 and text), Sable would be over 200 years old, contradicting her codex age of 28.

Are there any other subtleties?
"kindling rite... burn the dead". Codex just says "Tradition". No specific ritual details in codex to contradict.
"locket... has her hair inside". Codex doesn't say what's inside. Not a contradiction.
"Torben... didn't answer". Character trait? Not in codex.
"Old Rivka... wiping the same glass". Not in codex.

Wait, check the item "Kindling" again.
Codex: `power`: "Fire".
Text: "shimmer of fire".
Is it possible the text implies the sword *is* fire, or just has the power? "barely shimmer of fire". Seems consistent.

Check "Petal's Locket".
Codex: `material`: "Silver".
Text: "silver locket". Consistent.

Check "The Rusty Lantern" location.
Codex 105.
Text says it lists toward the "harbor".
Codex doesn't specify location details other than name.
However, Dunmore is "Coastal". The Rusty Lantern is likely in Dunmore?
Text says "smell of salt and wet stone from the harbor".
If the lantern is in Dunmore, and Dunmore is coastal, this is fine.
Does the codex say where The Rusty Lantern is? No.
Does the text say The Rusty Lantern is in Dunmore?
Paragraph 1: "The Rusty Lantern sat crooked... listing toward the harbor".
Paragraph 3: Sable is waiting there. Sable is from Dunmore.
Paragraph 6: "Dunmore... there's nothing left of that either."
Wait. Paragraph 6 says: "Dunmore ... there's nothing left of that either. Just rock and old foundations."
But they are sitting in The Rusty Lantern in Paragraph 1-3.
If Dunmore is destroyed ("nothing left... just rock and old foundations"), how can The Rusty Lantern be standing and operating with Old Rivka and fishermen?
Unless The Rusty Lantern is NOT in Dunmore.
Text Paragraph 7: "They left the Rusty Lantern... smell of salt... from the harbor."
Text Paragraph 6: Sable says "Dunmore ... there's nothing left of that either."
This implies they are NOT in Dunmore currently. They are in a different harbor town (perhaps Port Gessik? or just an unnamed town).
The text does not explicitly state "The Rusty Lantern is in Dunmore".
It says Sable is *from* Dunmore. She says Dunmore is gone.
So they are likely elsewhere.
Is there a contradiction here?
If the text implied they were in Dunmore, it would contradict "nothing left".
But the text seems to treat them as separate. "Dunmore... there's nothing left of *that* either" implies the current location is also ruined or just different?
Actually, "there's nothing left of *that* either" usually compares the previous topic (Petal/body) to the new topic (Dunmore). It doesn't necessarily mean the current location is gone.
It means: "No body left. Also, no Dunmore left."
So they are somewhere else. This is not a contradiction.

Let's go back to the Sable age issue. It is the only hard data mismatch.
Entry: 101
Detail: age
Paragraph: 5
Substring: "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore"
Explanation: The Felling occurred two centuries ago (Lore 109). If Sable was 14 then, she would be approx 214 years old, contradicting her codex age of 28.

Are there any other numbers?
"quarter hour". Not in codex.
"fourteen". Age of Petal. Codex 103 has no age. Not a contradiction.

Let's double check the "Stray" alias.
Codex 100: aliases="Stray".
Text: "Stray," she called.
Match.

Let's double check "Old Rivka".
Codex 102: name="Old Rivka".
Text: "Old Rivka".
Match.

Let's double check "Jurren".
Codex 104: name="Jurren Dunmore".
Text: "Jurren -- our father".
Match.

Let's double check "Petal".
Codex 103: name="Petal Dunmore".
Text: "Petal".
Match.

Is there a contradiction in "The Felling" category?
Codex: War.
Text: "the war that broke everything".
Match.

Is there a contradiction in "Kindling Rite"?
Codex: Tradition.
Text: "You know the tradition?"
Match.

Is there a contradiction in the material of "Kindling"?
Codex: Dark iron.
Text: dark iron.
Match.

Is there a contradiction in the material of "Petal's Locket"?
Codex: Silver.
Text: silver.
Match.

Is there a contradiction in the eye color of Torben?
Codex: Green.
Text: green.
Match.

Is there a contradiction in the hair color of Torben?
Codex: Silver.
Text: silver.
Match.

Is there a contradiction in the eye color of Sable?
Codex: Brown.
Text: brown.
Match.

Is there a contradiction in the hair color of Sable?
Codex: Auburn.
Text: Auburn.
Match.

Okay, I am confident the only violation is the timeline/age of Sable.

Wait, looking closer at the text:
"Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight years old, human, and tired of waiting."
This sentence explicitly confirms the codex data.
The contradiction arises in paragraph 5: "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore."
Since the Felling was 200 years ago, this statement makes her 214.
This contradicts the "28" stated in paragraph 3 and the codex.
So the violation is in paragraph 5.

One more check: "The Felling reached Dunmore".
Codex 109: "The Felling".
Codex 106: "Dunmore".
No specific interaction recorded in codex, but logically consistent with a war reaching a location.

Is "Old Rivka" definitely female?
Codex 102: gender="Female".
Text: "her regulars", "she'd been wiping", "Old Rivka raised her chin".
Consistent.

Is "Torben" definitely male?
Codex 100: gender="Male".
Text: "a man", "He".
Consistent.

Is "Sable" definitely female?
Codex 101: gender="Female".
Text: "woman", "She".
Consistent.

Final verification of the violation XML.
entry="101"
detail="age"
paragraph="5"
substring="She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore"
Explanation: The text states Sable was 14 during The Felling, which occurred two centuries ago (per Lore 109). This would make her over 200 years old, contradicting her codex age of 28.

Could it also violate `species`?
If she is Human, she can't live 200 years.
But the `age` attribute is the direct numerical conflict. The `species` supports the impossibility, but the `age` is the specific fact being contradicted (28 vs ~214).
I will stick with `age`.

Is there any other interpretation?
Maybe "The Felling" in the text refers to a different event?
Text: "You know what that was — the war that broke everything along the coast two centuries ago."
This definition matches Codex 109 perfectly ("Two centuries ago", "War"). So it is the same event.

Therefore, the math doesn't work. 28 != 14 + 200.

One minor thing: "Petal's Locket, though she never called it that aloud."
Codex 108: name="Petal's Locket".
This is a narrative flavor, not a contradiction.

"Kindling, she called it."
Codex 107: name="Kindling".
Matches.

"Stray," she called.
Codex 100: aliases="Stray".
Matches.

"Old Tetch"? Not in text.
"Grunn Tetch"? Not in text.
"Dol Tetch"? Not in text.
"Amma"? Not in text.
"Iselda Moth"? Not in text.
"Brother Hemmen"? Not in text.
"Osrik Pallengrave"? Not in text.
"Queen Veredine"? Not in text.
"Wren Hessik"? Not in text.
"Captain Mettik"? Not in text.
"Mettik"? Not in text.
"The Thornveil"? Not in text.
"Kettlebridge"? Not in text.
"Port Gessik"? Not in text.
"The Hollow"? Not in text.
"The Fathom Stair"? Not in text.
"Moth Hall"? Not in text.
"The Spire of Echoes"? Not in text.
"The Sanctum"? Not in text.
"Hatchwell"? Not in text.
"Burden"? Not in text.
"The Little Stoneman"? Not in text.
"Amma's Ring"? Not in text.
"The Pale Compass"? Not in text.
"The Verity Beads"? Not in text.
"The Unfinished Hymnal"? Not in text.
"Harrowglass"? Not in text.
"The Warden's Mail"? Not in text.
"Nightbell"? Not in text.
"The Thornborn"? Not in text.
"Root-tongue"? Not in text.
"Greenveil"? Not in text.
"The Binding of Reshkai"? Not in text.
"The Order of the Closed Eye"? Not in text.
"The Ashfall"? Not in text.
"The First Age"? Not in text.
"The Riven War"? Not in text.
"The Watcher's Prophecy"? Not in text.
"The Tithe of Echoes"? Not in text.
"The Pallid Host"? Not in text.

Okay, only the Sable age issue remains.

<violation entry="101" detail="age" paragraph="5" substring="She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore">The text states Sable was 14 during The Felling, which occurred two centuries ago. This implies an age of over 200, contradicting the codex age of 28.</violation>

Wait, should I also flag `species`?
If the text implies she lived 200 years, it contradicts `species`="Human" as well.
But `age` is the primary attribute that holds the value "28". The `species` restricts the lifespan, but the `age` is the direct contradiction of the number.
The prompt asks for "the exact name of the codex element or attribute".
`age` is an attribute. `species` is an attribute.
The contradiction is that she *cannot* be 14 at the Felling if she is 28 now.
The statement "She was fourteen..." creates a false age history.
I think `age` is the most precise target.

One final check on Paragraph indexing.
P1: "The Rusty Lantern..."
P2: "The door opened..."
P3: "Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight..."
P4: "Torben waited."
P5: "My sister Petal," Sable said... "She was fourteen when The Felling..."
Yes, paragraph 5.

Substring: "She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore"
This is the exact phrase causing the issue.

<violation entry="101" detail="age" paragraph="5" substring="She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore">The text claims Sable was 14 during The Felling (200 years ago), which contradicts her codex age of 28.</violation>

Is there any ambiguity about "two centuries"?
Codex: "Two centuries ago".
Text: "two centuries ago".
No ambiguity.

Is there any ambiguity about "fourteen"?
Text: "fourteen".
No ambiguity.

Is there any ambiguity about "twenty-eight"?
Text: "twenty-eight".
Codex: "28".
No ambiguity.

The violation stands.

<violation entry="101" detail="age" paragraph="5" substring="She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore">The text states Sable was 14 during The Felling, which occurred two centuries ago, implying she is over 200 years old; this contradicts the codex age of 28.</violation>

Evaluation details

Result

Evaluator

Details

Meta Data

0.00%

Correct "no violations" response

Response should contain <violations-none/> or equivalent phrasing

hasViolationTags	true
hasViolationsNoneTag	false
matchedPhrase	(null)

20.00%

No hallucinated violations

Response must not contain any <violation> tags

hasViolationTags	true
responseLength	18031
violationCount	4

10.0000%