"The text implies Silas limps on an unspecified leg, but the codex specifies he has a slight limp in his *left* leg; \"limped around\" could imply favoring either leg and does not contradict outright, but since precise detail is codified, the non-specificity here risks misrepresentation — however, this is ambiguous. Upon strict reading: no direct contradiction in side mentioned, so *no violation* for limp side. Re-evaluating: \"limped around\" doesn't specify leg, so it does *not* contradict left leg limp. Therefore, this should **not** be flagged. Withdraw this logic — no violation for limp side unless contradicted."
paragraph
2
substring
"limped around to her side"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"limped around to her side"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"his dark brown beard"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"4413"
detail
"beard"
summary
"Silas's beard matches his grey-streaked auburn hair per codex, but the passage says dark brown beard."
"The text implies Silas limps on an unspecified leg, but the codex specifies he has a slight limp in his *left* leg; \"limped around\" could imply favoring either leg and does not contradict outright, but since precise detail is codified, the non-specificity here risks misrepresentation — however, this is ambiguous. Upon strict reading: no direct contradiction in side mentioned, so *no violation* for limp side. Re-evaluating: \"limped around\" doesn't specify leg, so it does *not* contradict left leg limp. Therefore, this should **not** be flagged. Withdraw this logic — no violation for limp side unless contradicted."
paragraph
2
substring
"limped around to her side"
status
"false_positive"
location
extractedText
"limped around to her side"
inBounds
true
expectedText
"his dark brown beard"
locationAccurate
false
closestExpected
entry
"4413"
detail
"beard"
summary
"Silas's beard matches his grey-streaked auburn hair per codex, but the passage says dark brown beard."