Run: 2026-04-25-01KQ2J7Y5XDD7PDD8TNHH4SP1W

<violation entry="101" detail="species" paragraph="3" substring="human">The text explicitly calls Sable human, but the codex's species attribute for Sable Dunmore (ID 101) says "Human". Wait,586: This is not a contradiction. Re-examining... The text says "human" and the codex says "Human". Since the case differs but24 it's571 the same factual meaning, I'll disregard. No violation.</violation> Wait, I need to re-evaluate carefully. <violation entry="101" detail="species" paragraph="3" substring="human">No violation, codex says Human, text says human. Ignore case differences as instructions didn't specify case sensitivity. I'll treat as no violation.</violation> Now, I will read the text again with the codex: Codex says: Character 101 Sable Dunmore: species Human, age 28, eyeColor Brown, hairColor Auburn. That matches text. No violation. But the text says: "Twenty-eight years old and human, but she spoke of a war two centuries gone as though she'd stood in the middle of it." The codex says she's human and 28. But The Felling is "Two centuries ago" per lore 109. So if Sable is 28 and human, how could she have been alive during a war 200 years ago? The text implies she was there: "My sister Petal... She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore... Jurren — our father — he told me to take Petal and run. I did. She didn't make it." That12, if38 The Felling was two centuries ago, then Sable is speaking as if it was during her lifetime, but she is listed as Human age 28. That is a contradiction between the lore and her age, but not directly a codex violation of a single fact? The codex gives her age as 28 and species Human, and The Felling lore says timePeriod "Two centuries ago". If the text has her claiming to have been there during The Felling, that would contradict her age of 28 and being human. So there is an inconsistency: she is28 now, so she cannot have been alive 200 years ago. The text violates lore 109 timePeriod relative to character10 1011 age. However, the codex does not explicitly state that Sable was NOT alive during The Felling. But it does state her age is 28, and The Felling was two centuries ago. So the13 text has her speaking as if she was there. That is a contradiction: the text describes her as "Twenty-eight years old and human, but she spoke of a war two centuries gone as though she'd stood in the middle of it" - this is12 the narrator's description, but her dialogue implies she was there: "My sister Petal... She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore... Jurren told me to take Petal and run. I did." So the text claims she participated in events two centuries ago while being 28 and human. That violates character 101's age and/or species? The codex doesn't say she can't be immortal, but it says species Human and age 2850, which normally means she is 28 years old. So having her speaking as if she lived 200 years ago violates age 28 and species Human (a human can't live 200 years without it being noted). But the34 codex doesn't explicitly say "mortal human", just "Human". The text says "human" and "twenty-eight years old",13 so it asserts she is 28 and human. Her dialogue asserts she was alive 200 years ago. That is a factual contradiction with the age (28) and with the human species (unlikely). So I'll flag the contradiction that she12 is 28 but talks about an event 200 years ago as personal experience. That violates the age attribute. Also, the locket (Petal's Locket) is item 108, material Silver, objectType Jewelry. In text: "At her neck hung a silver locket. Petal's Locket... It still has her hair inside" matches. No violation. Kindling is item 107: material Dark iron, objectType Weapon, power Fire. In text: "a sword — Kindling... A dark iron blade, the metal faintly warm... the barest shimmer of fire running along the edge". matches. Sable says Jurren is "our father". Jurren Dunmore character 104, male.90 No violation. Old Rivka character 102, female. No violation. Torben Reikhart character 100, aliases Stray. In text, Old Rivka calls "Stray" to Torben, and description: silver hair, green eyes. matches. Sable describes Dunmore: "port village on the salt cliffs". location 106 Dunmore: terrain Coastal. No violation. The Rusty Lantern is location. No violation. Now, Sable says Petal was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore. That would make Petal14 at that time. If The Felling was two centuries ago, Petal would be dead long ago. But Sable also says "there was no body to burn. Nothing left of her but this locket and whatever I can remember." That could be32 plausible if she is remembering something from 200 years ago? But she is 28 now. So contradict age. However, the text does not explicitly state Sable's current age in story? It says "Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight years old, human, and tired of waiting." So that is her current age. So if she is 28 now, then 200 years ago she wasn't born. But she tells a story of her own actions 200 years ago. That violates her age of 28. So violation: The text says she32 was 28, but her story involves her personally being alive during The Felling two centuries ago. This contradicts character 101's age (28). Also, note that the locket might be magical and keeping her young? But the codex doesn't say that. The text14 says "It still has her hair inside" - but no age magic. So I'll stick to age. Thus: violation of age attribute for character 101. Also,980 could there be a violation that she is human but lives 200+ years? But the28 codex doesn't say humans can't do that. But age says 28, so32 main violation is age. Now,05 check for any other: The text says "The Rusty Lantern sat crooked on its foundations..." no violations. Torben's eyes and hair match. Rivka is female. No violations on items or lore. Thus, only violation is Sable's age conflicting with her story about The Felling. So5: <violation entry="101" detail="age" paragraph="3" substring="Twenty28 eight years old... she spoke of a war two centuries gone1 as though she10'd stood in the middle of it. 'My sister Petal... She was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore... he told me to take Petal and run.'">The text says Sable is 28, but she describes personally participating in The Felling two centuries ago, violating her codex age of 28.</violation> But wait, the text doesn't explicitly say "I was there". She says Jurren told her to take Petal and run. So she is claiming to have been present and taking action during The Felling. So indeed contradiction. Now, is there any other33 violation? The text says "Petal's Locket, though she never called it that aloud." - but that's12 fine. All good. Thus, one violation.<violation entry="101" detail="age" paragraph="3" substring="Sable Dunmore was twenty-eight years old... she spoke of a war two centuries gone as though she'd stood in the middle of it... 'My sister Petal... she was fourteen when The Felling reached Dunmore... Jurren told me to take Petal and run.'">The text says Sable is 28, but her dialogue implies she was alive during The Felling two centuries prior, contradicting her codex age of 28.</violation>