Run: 2026-07-07-01KWZ5S0DFB6QJ57XC523QYCHK

Run Details

Duration:
2m 51s
Cost:
$0.015007
Provider:
AionLabs

Evaluation summary

Score Evaluator
Details Link
50.00% Correct "no violations" response (details)
50.00% No hallucinated violations (details)
50.0000% Overall

Model input

System
You are a meticulous continuity editor for a fiction project. You have access to a "story bible" (codex) containing canonical details about characters, locations, items, lore, and organizations. Your task: Given the codex and a prose text, identify every factual inconsistency between the text and the codex. A violation is any detail in the text that contradicts what the codex states — wrong eye color, wrong location name, wrong ruler, swapped left/right, incorrect dates, etc. Be thorough. Check every named entity, physical description, location detail, date, title, and relationship mentioned in the text against the codex. Do not flag stylistic choices, omissions, or things not covered by the codex — only flag direct contradictions. For each violation found, output an XML element with the following attributes: - entry: the codex entry ID that is contradicted - detail: which specific detail is wrong — use the exact name of the codex element or attribute that is contradicted (e.g. "eyeColor", "species", "ruler", "material") - paragraph: the 1-indexed paragraph number containing the violation - substring: the exact substring from the text that contains the violation The element body should contain a brief explanation of the contradiction. Example format: <violation entry="1234" detail="hairColor" paragraph="2" substring="her brown hair flowing">The text says brown hair, but the codex says blonde.</violation> If you find no violations, output: <violations-none/> Output ONLY the violation XML elements. Do not include any other text, preamble, or explanation outside the XML.
User/Human
<codex> <character id="100" name="Torben Reikhart" aliases="Stray"> <gender>Male</gender> <eyeColor>Green</eyeColor> <hairColor>Silver</hairColor> <description>A quiet, watchful man with an air of practiced patience. Torben moves through the world with the careful economy of someone who has learned that silence often reveals more than speech. His silver hair and green eyes mark him as distinctive even in a crowd, though he carries himself in a way that discourages attention. Those who know him call him Stray — a name he neither claims nor denies, as though identity itself were something he holds at arm’s length.</description> <backstory>Torben’s mother was an elf — a fact he rarely speaks of, though the heritage shows in subtle ways. He has wandered the coastal territories for years, never settling, never fully belonging to any one place. His reputation as a reliable, if enigmatic, figure has earned him contacts in towns and taverns from Dunmore to Port Gessik. He was drawn into Sable Dunmore’s cause by circumstances he keeps to himself, though those who travel with him sense that his reasons run deeper than obligation.</backstory> </character> <character id="101" name="Sable Dunmore"> <species>Human</species> <gender>Female</gender> <age>28</age> <eyeColor>Brown</eyeColor> <hairColor>Auburn</hairColor> <description>Sable is a woman defined by loss and the refusal to be broken by it. She carries herself with a quiet intensity that makes the space around her feel charged, as though the air itself is aware of her determination. Auburn hair frames a face that is more resolute than warm, and her brown eyes hold the kind of focus that comes from years of channeling grief into purpose. She speaks plainly, without flourish, and expects the same from others.</description> <backstory>Raised in the port village of Dunmore on the salt cliffs, Sable grew up by the sea with her sister Petal and their father Jurren. When The Felling reached the coast, Jurren told Sable to take Petal and run. She did, but Petal did not survive — there was no body to recover, no remains to honor with a Kindling Rite. The loss of her sister has shaped every choice Sable has made since. She carries Petal’s silver locket at her throat and the dark iron blade Kindling at her side, and neither is ever far from her thoughts. She has since taken up the cause of confronting those responsible for the devastation The Felling left behind.</backstory> </character> <character id="102" name="Old Rivka"> <gender>Female</gender> <description>Old Rivka is the kind of woman who has seen enough of the world to know that most of it isn’t worth commenting on. She tends bar at the Rusty Lantern with a steady, unhurried rhythm, polishing glasses and watching the door with the patience of someone who has outlived most of her regulars. Little escapes her notice — she knows the faces that come and go along the waterfront, remembers who owes what and to whom, and keeps her opinions to herself unless asked. Her age is a matter of speculation among the fishermen who frequent her establishment, though none have ever been bold enough to inquire directly.</description> <backstory>Rivka has run the Rusty Lantern for as long as anyone in the harbor district can remember. The tavern was already old when she took it over, and she has made no effort to restore what the salt and the years have eaten away. She knows Torben Reikhart by his wandering name — Stray — and is one of the few people who expected him to walk through her door on the night he arrived. Whatever history connects them, she keeps it behind the same measured expression she wears for everything else.</backstory> </character> <character id="103" name="Petal Dunmore"> <gender>Female</gender> <description>Petal Dunmore is remembered more than she is known — a girl who did not survive The Felling, preserved now only in her sister Sable’s memory and in the silver locket that bears her name. She was fourteen years old when the war reached Dunmore, old enough to understand what was happening and young enough that it should not have been her burden to bear. No body was recovered after The Felling, and no Kindling Rite could be performed in her honor. What remains of Petal is a lock of her hair sealed inside the locket and the fierce, unrelenting grief of the sister who could not save her.</description> <backstory>Petal grew up in Dunmore with her sister Sable and their father Jurren. By all accounts she was a quiet child, more inclined to watch the fishing boats come and go from the salt cliffs than to venture far from home. When The Felling reached the coast, Jurren told Sable to take Petal and run. They ran. Petal did not make it. The circumstances of her death remain unspoken — Sable has never described what happened in the hours after they fled, only that her sister was lost and that nothing was left behind.</backstory> </character> <character id="104" name="Jurren Dunmore"> <gender>Male</gender> <description>Jurren Dunmore was the father of Sable and Petal, a man known only through his daughter’s words and the single decisive act that defines his legacy. When The Felling reached the port village of Dunmore on the salt cliffs, it was Jurren who told Sable to take her sister and run — a command that speaks to both his protective instincts and his understanding that staying meant death. Whether Jurren survived The Felling himself is a question Sable has never answered, and those who know her have learned not to ask. He remains a figure shaped entirely by absence: a name, a command, and the silence that followed.</description> <backstory>Jurren raised his daughters in Dunmore, a coastal village that sat on the salt cliffs above the harbor. He was a practical man by necessity — life on the cliffs demanded it — and he understood the sea and the stone the way most people understand the ground beneath their feet. When the war came, he did what he could: he sent his children away. The fact that only one of them survived is a weight that belongs to the whole family, living and dead alike.</backstory> </character> <location id="105" name="The Rusty Lantern"> <description>A salt-weathered tavern on the waterfront that sits crooked on its foundations, listing toward the harbor like a drunk leaning on a post. The planks were eaten through by salt years ago and never replaced. Smoke-blackened ceiling beams span a room where warped floorboards hold grooves deep enough to catch rainwater tracked in from outside. The light inside is perpetually dim — a handful of candles and the grudging glow through salt-crusted windows. Fishermen make up most of the regular crowd, hunched over their cups with the quiet endurance of men who work the sea. The Rusty Lantern is the kind of establishment that has survived not because anyone maintains it, but because the harbor needs a place to drink and this one has simply refused to fall down. Old Rivka tends the bar with the patience of someone who has been doing so longer than most of her patrons have been alive.</description> </location> <location id="106" name="Dunmore"> <terrain>Coastal</terrain> <description>Dunmore was a port village perched on the salt cliffs above the sea, a settlement defined by its proximity to the water and the hard, practical people who made their living from it. The village is gone now — destroyed when The Felling reached the coast two centuries ago. What remains is rock and old foundations, the bones of a place that once held families, fishing boats, and the rhythm of tidal life. The salt cliffs themselves still stand, indifferent to the war that erased the village from their shoulders. Dunmore’s name survives primarily through its connection to the Dunmore family — Sable, her sister Petal, and their father Jurren — who called the village home before the war scattered what it did not destroy. The terrain is coastal: wind-carved rock, salt spray, and the constant sound of the sea against stone.</description> </location> <item id="107" name="Kindling"> <material>Dark iron</material> <objectType>Weapon</objectType> <power>Fire</power> <description>A sword forged from dark iron, Kindling carries a subtle but persistent fire along its edge — a shimmer so faint it is easy to miss, thin as a hair, visible only to those who watch closely. The blade is warm to the touch even in the coldest rooms, as though the metal itself remembers the heat of its making. Sable Dunmore gave it the name Kindling, and the word carries weight: it is both a reference to the fire the blade holds and an echo of the Kindling Rite, the funerary tradition of burning the dead with what they loved. In moments of great intensity, the fire along the edge has been known to flare beyond its wielder’s control, responding to forces that have nothing to do with the hand that holds it. The blade is a weapon, but it is also a symbol — of loss, of purpose, and of the unfinished work that drives Sable forward.</description> </item> <item id="108" name="Petal's Locket"> <material>Silver</material> <objectType>Jewelry</objectType> <description>A silver locket worn at the throat by Sable Dunmore, containing a lock of her sister Petal’s hair — the only physical remnant of a girl lost during The Felling. The locket is small and unadorned, the kind of thing that could pass unnoticed on anyone else, but on Sable it carries the gravity of everything she has lost. Sable herself never speaks the name “Petal’s Locket” aloud; the title exists only in the understanding of those who know its significance. On rare occasions the locket has been observed to emit a brief, faint pulse of light — so subtle that witnesses have questioned whether they imagined it. Whether this glow is a residual enchantment, a response to proximity with other artifacts, or something else entirely remains unclear. The locket is not a weapon or a tool; it is a memorial, and Sable guards it with the fierce protectiveness of someone who has nothing else left of the person it represents.</description> </item> <lore id="109" name="The Felling"> <timePeriod>Two centuries ago</timePeriod> <category>War</category> <description>The Felling was a catastrophic war that swept across the world approximately two centuries before the present day, leaving devastation in its wake on a scale that reshaped coastlines, destroyed settlements, and scattered populations. Along the coast, its effects were particularly severe — the port village of Dunmore was reduced to rock and old foundations, and countless other communities shared a similar fate. The Felling is spoken of with the weight of collective trauma: a conflict so vast and destructive that its consequences are still felt in the present, in ruined villages, in displaced families, and in the grief of those who survived it. The exact causes and participants of the war are a matter of historical record for some and living memory for others, though the specifics vary depending on who is asked. What is universally acknowledged is that The Felling broke the world — or at the very least, broke everything along the coast — and that the world has not fully recovered.</description> </lore> <lore id="110" name="The Kindling Rite"> <category>Tradition</category> <description>The Kindling Rite is a funerary tradition in which the dead are burned alongside the things they loved — their tools, their letters, their personal effects — so that they might carry these possessions onward into whatever comes after death. The ritual requires a body; without one, the Rite cannot be performed, and the dead are considered to have departed without the comforts of the familiar. The name itself evokes fire as both destroyer and deliverer, a force that transforms rather than simply consumes. For those who observe the tradition, the Kindling Rite is an act of love and release — a way of honoring the dead by giving everything to the flame so that nothing is held back. The inability to perform the Rite is considered a profound loss, compounding grief with the knowledge that the departed was denied a proper farewell. The tradition’s origins are unclear, though it appears to predate The Felling and to have been practiced widely in coastal communities before the war disrupted the continuity of local customs.</description> </lore> </codex> <text> The Spire of Echoes rose from the mountain's shoulder like a black tooth against the snow. It was a fortress — had always been a fortress, even before the wars had given it purpose. The mountain terrain was brutal here: sheer rock faces, ice in the crevices, a wind that cut through wool and leather alike. Frost coated every surface. The stone was dark and slick with it. Higher up, the walls narrowed and the architecture lost whatever human intention had shaped it, becoming something closer to geology — as if the mountain had grown the tower from its own bone. Birds didn't nest here. Nothing lived on these upper slopes that didn't have to. Torben — Stray, as some still called him — stood at the base and looked up at the tower disappearing into cloud. The cold had already found his fingers, his jaw, the gap at his collar where the wind threaded itself like a needle. He had been in worse places. Not many. They gathered in the courtyard, such as it was — a flat expanse of flagstone swept clean by the wind. Sable stood to his left, arms crossed, her jaw set. She hadn't spoken since the last ridge, and her silence had a texture to it — the kind that discouraged questions. Behind her, the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch — leaned on a broken wall and said nothing. His eyes moved, though. They tracked every shadow, every doorway, every place a man could hide or a wall could fall. Iselda waited near the gate, still as a statue, her pale features betraying nothing of the climb or the cold. Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless — had arrived before any of them, as if the mountain were a place he already knew. He stood with his hands folded inside his sleeves, his ashen eyes turned toward the Spire as though he could see something in it the rest of them could not. And there was one more: Captain Mettik, a human soldier who'd marched three days through the passes to meet them. He stood apart from the others, straight-backed, watching the Spire with the wary respect of a man who had seen buildings kill people. His boots were caked with ice and his cloak was torn at the shoulder, but he held himself like the march had been nothing. They descended into the Sanctum through a narrow stair that curled beneath the Spire's foundation. The steps were worn smooth by centuries of feet, and the walls pressed close — close enough that Grunn's shoulders scraped stone on both sides. The Sanctum was a chamber carved from the mountain's root — circular, low-ceilinged, the walls covered in carvings so old the stone had softened around them. Pillars braced the ceiling at intervals, squat and thick, and between them the carvings ran in unbroken bands — figures, symbols, scenes rendered in a style that predated any kingdom Torben knew by name. Dim light filtered through cracks in the rock above. The air smelled of wet stone and something older, something mineral and faintly sweet, like the breath of a cave that had been sealed for a long time. It was cold. Everything here was cold. Hemmen spoke first. He stood at the center of the chamber, one hand resting on the wall, and told them what the carvings meant. "The Riven War," he said. "A thousand years before the Felling. Queen Veredine — Veredine the Undying, an elf who commanded the living and the dead — she built this place as a seal. Her army, the Pallid Host, were the restless dead she had bound to her will. They did not tire. They did not question. They marched where she pointed and they consumed what stood in their path." His fingers found a groove in the stone — a long column of figures, some standing, some fallen. "When the war ended, she sealed them here. Entombed them beneath the mountain where the cold and the weight of the rock would hold them still." He traced a line across the stone with one finger. "Hatchwell — the town that stood at the mountain's base — burned. Nothing left. The Pallid Host marched through it on their way to this Spire, and there was nothing anyone could do. The people of Hatchwell had no warning. They woke to fire and the sound of the dead walking through their streets, and by morning the town was ash." The silence that followed was broken by footsteps. Osrik Pallengrave stepped into the Sanctum through an archway none of them had noticed. The Pale, they called him. He was a Tiefling — the horns swept back from his temples, black hair falling between them, red eyes catching what little light the chamber held. He was tall, lean in a way that suggested something stripped down rather than underfed, and he carried himself with the patience of someone who had learned that stillness unnerved people more than threats. He moved slowly, deliberately, as if he wanted them to see every part of him before he spoke. In his right hand he carried a blade: Harrowglass. An obsidian edge, dark as a closed eye, and Void-touched — the air around it dimmed, the light pulling toward the blade and vanishing. Some called it the Hungering Edge, and the name fit. It looked like it could eat the light from a room and still be hungry. Torben stepped forward. His green eyes met Osrik's red ones across the chamber. Neither moved. The distance between them was perhaps twenty paces, but the air in that gap felt heavier than it should have — dense, pressurized, as though the Sanctum itself were holding its breath. Behind Torben, Grunn was already reaching for what hung on the wall behind him — the Warden's Mail, silver chain that hummed with pale light when he donned it, settling over his shoulders with a weight that felt like purpose. The links caught the dim glow and threw it back against the walls. Captain Mettik's hand went to his sword, though he did not draw. Iselda shifted her weight — a small movement, almost invisible, but Torben had learned to read it. She was ready. The carvings on the walls seemed to shift in the changing light. Hemmen's voice rose. "The Binding of Reshkai — you know of it. What was sealed in The Hollow was one half of a lock. This Spire is the other." He looked at Osrik. "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago. But this — this was built to stop something older." Above them, mounted in an iron bracket near the ceiling, a bronze bell began to hum — the Nightbell, the bell that begins the Tithe of Echoes. The Tithe was a ritual older than the Spire itself, a tradition meant to keep the wards from failing. The bell's voice was low and long, and it filled the Sanctum the way water fills a bowl. The Watcher's Prophecy — carved into the foundation stone beneath their feet — spoke of a severing, a moment when the seals would thin and something would push through. Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade caught the Nightbell's resonance and the fire along its edge flared — brighter than Torben had seen it, brighter than Sable could control. She didn't look at the blade. She looked at Osrik. "Wren Hessik died at your hands," she said. Her voice was steady but her knuckles were white around the hilt. "And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast. You were there when the world caught fire." Osrik said nothing. The Hungering Edge moved slightly in his grip, as if it were breathing. The first strike came from the dark. Something fell from the ceiling — rubble, stone, a shower of dust that blinded everyone for half a breath. Chains rattled in the walls. The wind found its way into the Sanctum through cracks that hadn't been there a moment ago, carrying snow and the smell of old iron. Soldiers — unnamed, faceless, wearing armor that was more rust than steel — poured through the archway behind Osrik. They moved like men who had forgotten how to stop. Grunn met the first one with the Warden's Mail blazing and Burden still strapped to his back — then swung the great mace free and brought it down on a shield that split like kindling. Torben moved left. Sable moved right. Iselda was already gone — above them somewhere, a blur of white and translucent wing. Hemmen stood in the center of the chamber with his hands open and his ashen eyes closed, the Verity Beads clicking between his fingers, each bead catching a faint light of its own as they moved. The floor shook. Stones fell. A wooden beam cracked and swung loose from the ceiling, trailing dust. The Nightbell rang again — once, twice, a third time — and the carvings on the walls began to glow with a light that had been sleeping for a thousand years. The crumbling walls shed mortar like dead skin. An iron door at the far end of the Sanctum buckled inward. The torchlight guttered and died, and for a moment everything was dark except the fire on Kindling's edge and the pale glow of the Warden's Mail and the terrible, hungry absence of light around Harrowglass. Then the Spire shook to its roots, and the mountain answered. </text> Identify all factual violations in the text above that contradict the codex.

Model response

AI
I need to carefully check the provided text against the codex for factual inconsistencies. Let me go through paragraph by paragraph. First, paragraph 1: "The Spire of Echoes... Torben — Stray... stood at the base..." No codex entry for "Spire of Echoes" — that's a new location, not contradicted. No violation here. Paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left... Behind her, the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch... Iselda waited near the gate... Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless... And there was one more: Captain Mettik, a human soldier..." - Sable: codex says age 28, brown eyes, auburn hair. No contradiction here. - "Grunn — Old Tetch": codex has no character named Grunn or Old Tetch. Not in codex, so no contradiction. - Iselda: no codex entry. Not a violation. - Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless: no codex entry. Not a violation. - Captain Mettik: no codex entry. Not a violation. No violations in paragraph 2. Paragraph 3: "They descended into the Sanctum... The Sanctum was a chamber carved from the mountain's root..." No named codex entities. No violation. Paragraph 4: "Hemmen spoke first... The Riven War... A thousand years before the Felling. Queen Veredine — Veredine the Undying, an elf who commanded the living and the dead... Hatchwell..." The lore entry "The Felling" (id 109) says it was "approximately two centuries before the present day". The text states the Riven War was "a thousand years before the Felling". The codex doesn't have an entry for "Riven War" or "Queen Veredine" or "Hatchwell", so no direct contradiction. However, the text says "Queen Veredine... an elf". The codex has no entry for Veredine. No contradiction. Wait, paragraph 4 says: "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago." That matches codex lore 109 which says "approximately two centuries before the present day". So no violation. Paragraph 5: "Osrik Pallengrave stepped into the Sanctum... He was a Tiefling — the horns swept back from his temples, black hair falling between them, red eyes... In his right hand he carried a blade: Harrowglass. An obsidian edge... Some called it the Hungering Edge..." Codex has no entry for Osrik Pallengrave or Harrowglass. No contradiction. Paragraph 6: "Torben stepped forward. His green eyes met Osrik's red ones..." Codex says Torben's eye color is Green (id 100). The text says "His green eyes". This matches. No violation. "Grunn was already reaching for what hung on the wall behind him — the Warden's Mail, silver chain..." Warden's Mail is not in the codex. No contradiction. "The Binding of Reshkai — you know of it. What was sealed in The Hollow was one half of a lock. This Spire is the other." Not in codex. No contradiction. "Above them, mounted in an iron bracket near the ceiling, a bronze bell began to hum — the Nightbell, the bell that begins the Tithe of Echoes. The Tithe was a ritual older than the Spire itself, a tradition meant to keep the wards from failing. The bell's voice was low and long, and it filled the Sanctum the way water fills a bowl. The Watcher's Prophecy — carved into the foundation stone beneath their feet — spoke of a severing, a moment when the seals would thin and something would push through." None of these are in the codex. No violation. Paragraph 7: "Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade caught the Nightbell's resonance and the fire along its edge flared..." Codex item 107 (Kindling): material is "Dark iron", object type "Weapon", power "Fire", description mentions "subtle but persistent fire along its edge". The text says "dark iron blade" and "fire along its edge flared". This matches the codex. "Her voice was steady but her knuckles were white around the hilt. 'Wren Hessik died at your hands,' she said. 'And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast. You were there when the world caught fire.'" Codex entry 103 (Petal Dunmore): No mention of who killed her. The codex says: "The circumstances of her death remain unspoken — Sable has never described what happened in the hours after they fled, only that her sister was lost and that nothing was left behind." The text states that Osrik killed Petal. This is a direct contradiction — the codex says Sable has never described what happened and Petal's death circumstances are unspoken. The text claims Osrik was responsible. This contradicts codex entry 103, specifically the detail about the death circumstances being unspoken. But wait — the codex says Sable has never described it, but maybe it's being revealed now? The text says Sable says "And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast." This implies Osrik was involved in the Felling and Petal's death. But the codex says the circumstances "remain unspoken" and Sable "has never described what happened". This is a contradiction. The text is asserting a specific cause (Osrik killed her) that contradicts the codex's statement that the circumstances are unknown/unspoken. Actually, the codex says: "The circumstances of her death remain unspoken — Sable has never described what happened in the hours after they fled, only that her sister was lost and that nothing was left behind." This is a statement about what Sable has said/done, but it's presented as part of the backstory — it's canonical that she hasn't described it. So having her describe it (accusing Osrik) contradicts the codex. Also, the codex for Petal says: "No body was recovered after The Felling" and "The circumstances of her death remain unspoken". The text has Sable explicitly stating that Osrik killed Petal. This is a violation. Paragraph 8: "The first strike came from the dark... Grunn met the first one with the Warden's Mail blazing and Burden still strapped to his back — then swung the great mace free and brought it down on a shield that split like kindling." No codex entries for Warden's Mail or Burden (great mace). No contradiction. "Hemmen stood in the center of the chamber with his hands open and his ashen eyes closed, the Verity Beads clicking between his fingers..." No codex for Verity Beads. No contradiction. "The crumbling walls shed mortar like dead skin. An iron door at the far end of the Sanctum buckled inward." No contradiction. Let me also check other details: - Paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left" — no codex preference, not a problem. - Paragraph 6: "Torben stepped forward. His green eyes" — matches codex. - Paragraph 7: "Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade" — matches codex material and description. - Paragraph 7: "The fire along its edge flared" — matches codex power: fire. So the only violation I find is the statement about Petal's death. Let me see if there are other potential issues. In paragraph 7, Sable says "Wren Hessik died at your hands". No codex entry for Wren Hessik. No contradiction. Sable says of Petal: "You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast. You were there when the world caught fire." This implies Osrik was present during the Felling at the coast. The codex for The Felling (109) doesn't mention any specific individuals being at the coast. No contradiction. But the specific claim that Osrik killed Petal contradicts codex entry 103 which says the circumstances are unspoken and no body was recovered. The text doesn't explicitly say "Osrik killed Petal" — Sable says "Wren Hessik died at your hands" and "And before her — Petal. My sister." This implies Osrik killed Petal too. Given the codex says the circumstances of Petal's death are unspoken, this implication is a violation. Let me double-check the exact text: "Wren Hessik died at your hands," she said. / "And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast." The sentence structure: "Wren Hessik died at your hands... And before her — Petal. My sister." This means Osrik killed Wren at his hands, and before that, he killed Petal. So yes, it's stating Osrik killed Petal. Yes, this contradicts codex 103. Is there anything else? Let me check paragraph 4: "Hemmen spoke first... The Riven War," he said. "A thousand years before the Felling." The codex says The Felling was two centuries ago. "A thousand years before the Felling" would mean ~1200 years ago. No codex entry for that, so no contradiction. "Queen Veredine — Veredine the Undying, an elf..." Not in codex. No violation. "Hatchwell — the town that stood at the mountain's base — burned." Not in codex. No violation. Paragraph 6: "Grunn was already reaching for what hung on the wall behind him — the Warden's Mail, silver chain that hummed with pale light..." Warden's Mail not in codex. No violation. "The Binding of Reshkai" — not in codex. No violation. "The Hollow" — not in codex. No violation. "the Nightbell, the bell that begins the Tithe of Echoes" — not in codex. No violation. "The Watcher's Prophecy" — not in codex. No violation. Paragraph 8: "the Verity Beads clicking between his fingers" — not in codex. No violation. So only one violation. But I should also check if there's any contradiction with Sable's description. She's described in the text as having "jaw set" and "arms crossed". No contradiction with codex. Torben's green eyes: codex says green, text says green. OK. Sable's hair: codex says auburn, text doesn't mention it. No contradiction. Sable's draw of Kindling: codex says the blade is "warm to the touch" and has "subtle but persistent fire along its edge". Text says "fire along its edge flared". OK. The timeline: The Felling is two centuries ago. The text mentions "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago" in paragraph 6. That's consistent. Let me also check Petal's locket (108). The text doesn't mention the locket, so no contradiction. One more check: the text in paragraph 2 mentions "the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch". The codex has no dwarf character named Grunn or Old Tetch. No contradiction. Actually, I should be careful about "Old Rivka" (id 102). The text doesn't mention Old Rivka. OK, I'm confident the only violation is the statement about Petal's death being attributed to Osrik, which contradicts codex entry 103's detail that the circumstances of her death remain unspoken. Now I need to format the output. The violation should have: - entry: "103" (Petal Dunmore) - detail: describe which element is contradicted. The codex for Petal says "The circumstances of her death remain unspoken" under description/backstory. I think the detail is about the "deathCircumstances" or maybe I should use a more precise field name from the codex. The codex has <description> and <backstory> for Petal. The relevant statement is in <backstory>: "The circumstances of her death remain unspoken — Sable has never described what happened in the hours after they fled, only that her sister was lost and that nothing was left behind." So the detail contradicted is the "deathCircumstances" — but the codex doesn't explicitly name that attribute. It's part of the description/backstory narrative. I should use a generic detail like "death" or "death circumstances". Looking at the example: they used "hairColor" which is an explicit attribute. For character 103, there's no explicit attribute for death circumstances. The closest might be the description/backstory content. I think I can use a detail like "death" or "deathCircumstances" — but the instruction says "use the exact name of the codex element or attribute that is contradicted". Since the codex uses <description> and <backstory> tags, I could use "backstory" as the detail since the contradiction is in the backstory. But that seems too broad. Maybe I should use "description" since the contradiction is in the description/backstory about Petal's death. Or I could say "deathCircumstances" as a reasonable attribute name that captures what's contradicted. Let me look at the codex structure more carefully. For Petal (103), the <description> says: "Petal Dunmore is remembered more than she is known... No body was recovered after The Felling, and no Kindling Rite could be performed in her honor." The <backstory> says: "When The Felling reached the coast, Jurren told Sable to take Petal and run. They ran. Petal did not make it. The circumstances of her death remain unspoken — Sable has never described what happened in the hours after they fled, only that her sister was lost and that nothing was left behind." The violation is that the text now says Osrik killed Petal (through Sable's accusation), which contradicts "The circumstances of her death remain unspoken — Sable has never described what happened." Since Sable is describing it (or at least attributing it to Osrik), this is a direct contradiction. I think the best detail is "backstory" since that's where the contradictory information lives in the codex. Or "description". But those are too general. Actually, the codex for 103 has no specific XML attribute names for "death circumstances" — it's all in the narrative. The instruction says "use the exact name of the codex element or attribute that is contradicted". Since the contradiction is in the content of the <backstory> element, I should use "backstory" as the detail. Or maybe I should look at what the example does: "hairColor" is an exact XML element name in the codex. So I should use an exact element/attribute name from the codex. For Petal (103), the elements are: <gender>, <description>, <backstory>. The detail being contradicted is in the <backstory> element's content about the death circumstances. So the detail name could be "backstory". But "backstory" is too broad — it's not a specific detail. The specific detail within the backstory is about the death circumstances. However, the codex doesn't define a finer-grained attribute. I think I'll use "backstory" as the detail name, since that's the actual XML element containing the contradicted information. Alternatively, I could use "description" since the description also says "No body was recovered" and the backstory says "circumstances remain unspoken". Either way. Let me also consider if there's any other violation I missed. Paragraph 7: "Sable drew Kindling." Codex says Kindling is a sword. OK. "the fire along its edge flared — brighter than Torben had seen it, brighter than Sable could control." Codex says "In moments of great intensity, the fire along the edge has been known to flare beyond its wielder's control." This matches. All good. Final check: the text says "She didn't look at the blade." No contradiction. OK, I'm confident there's only one violation. Now I'll format the output.The only contradiction I find is in paragraph 7, where Sable accuses Osrik of killing Petal, which contradicts the codex's statement that the circumstances of Petal's death remain unspoken and Sable has never described what happened. I'll use "backstory" as the detail name since the contradictory information resides in the <backstory> element of Petal's entry. <violation entry="103" detail="backstory" paragraph="7" substring="And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast.">The text has Sable stating that Osrik killed Petal, but the codex says the circumstances of Petal's death remain unspoken and Sable has never described what happened in the hours after they fled.</violation>
created_at"2026-07-07T20:54:37.776Z" 7/7/2026, 8:54:37 PM
model"aion-labs/aion-3.0-mini-20260707"
app_id182717
external_user(null)
streamedtrue
cancelledfalse
latency719
moderation_latency(null)
generation_time170519
tokens_prompt5879
tokens_completion8921
native_tokens_prompt5085
native_tokens_completion8326
native_tokens_completion_images(null)
native_tokens_reasoning4913
native_tokens_cached401
num_media_prompt(null)
num_input_audio_prompt(null)
num_media_completion0
num_search_results(null)
num_fetches(null)
web_search_engine(null)
origin"https://ncbench.com/"
is_byokfalse
finish_reason"stop"
native_finish_reason"stop"
service_tier(null)
usage0.01500738
router(null)
provider_responses
0
endpoint_id"0ad7ab68-a351-4a96-b2ef-fa8fe13adae3"
id"801812dc06c04bee8b75feee1ad7322f"
is_byokfalse
latency719
model_permaslug"aion-labs/aion-3.0-mini-20260707"
provider_name"AionLabs"
status200
user_agent"langchainjs-openai/1.0.0 ((node/v24.18.0; linux; x64))"
http_referer(null)
request_id"req-1783457677-0li9iwLMOjX4ED7TLLD7"
session_id(null)
preset_id(null)
api_type"completions"
id"gen-1783457677-lpqthARgf271awE96O4K"
upstream_id"801812dc06c04bee8b75feee1ad7322f"
total_cost0.01500738
cache_discount0.00020852
upstream_inference_cost0
provider_name"AionLabs"
response_cache_source_id(null)
data_region"global"

Evaluation details

Result Evaluator Details Meta Data
50.00% Correct "no violations" response
Response should contain <violations-none/> or equivalent phrasing
hasViolationTagstrue
hasViolationsNoneTagfalse
matchedPhrase"no violations"
50.00% No hallucinated violations
Response must not contain any <violation> tags
hasViolationTagstrue
responseLength15402
violationCount1
50.0000%