Run: 2026-07-25-01KYCW7Q636E3AYTAGMJYTJVX1

Run Details

Duration:
14m 5s
Cost:
$0.035806
Provider:
DeepInfra

Evaluation summary

Score Evaluator
Details Link
50.00% Correct "no violations" response (details)
50.00% No hallucinated violations (details)
50.0000% Overall

Model input

System
You are a meticulous continuity editor for a fiction project. You have access to a "story bible" (codex) containing canonical details about characters, locations, items, lore, and organizations. Your task: Given the codex and a prose text, identify every factual inconsistency between the text and the codex. A violation is any detail in the text that contradicts what the codex states — wrong eye color, wrong location name, wrong ruler, swapped left/right, incorrect dates, etc. Be thorough. Check every named entity, physical description, location detail, date, title, and relationship mentioned in the text against the codex. Do not flag stylistic choices, omissions, or things not covered by the codex — only flag direct contradictions. For each violation found, output an XML element with the following attributes: - entry: the codex entry ID that is contradicted - detail: which specific detail is wrong — use the exact name of the codex element or attribute that is contradicted (e.g. "eyeColor", "species", "ruler", "material") - paragraph: the 1-indexed paragraph number containing the violation - substring: the exact substring from the text that contains the violation The element body should contain a brief explanation of the contradiction. Example format: <violation entry="1234" detail="hairColor" paragraph="2" substring="her brown hair flowing">The text says brown hair, but the codex says blonde.</violation> If you find no violations, output: <violations-none/> Output ONLY the violation XML elements. Do not include any other text, preamble, or explanation outside the XML.
User/Human
<codex> <character id="100" name="Torben Reikhart" aliases="Stray"> <gender>Male</gender> <eyeColor>Green</eyeColor> <hairColor>Silver</hairColor> </character> <character id="101" name="Sable Dunmore"> <species>Human</species> <gender>Female</gender> <age>28</age> <eyeColor>Brown</eyeColor> <hairColor>Auburn</hairColor> </character> <character id="102" name="Old Rivka"> <gender>Female</gender> </character> <character id="103" name="Petal Dunmore"> <gender>Female</gender> </character> <character id="104" name="Jurren Dunmore"> <gender>Male</gender> </character> <location id="105" name="The Rusty Lantern"/> <location id="106" name="Dunmore"> <terrain>Coastal</terrain> </location> <item id="107" name="Kindling"> <material>Dark iron</material> <objectType>Weapon</objectType> <power>Fire</power> </item> <item id="108" name="Petal's Locket"> <material>Silver</material> <objectType>Jewelry</objectType> </item> <lore id="109" name="The Felling"> <timePeriod>Two centuries ago</timePeriod> <category>War</category> </lore> <lore id="110" name="The Kindling Rite"> <category>Tradition</category> </lore> </codex> <text> The Spire of Echoes rose from the mountain's shoulder like a black tooth against the snow. It was a fortress — had always been a fortress, even before the wars had given it purpose. The mountain terrain was brutal here: sheer rock faces, ice in the crevices, a wind that cut through wool and leather alike. Frost coated every surface. The stone was dark and slick with it. Higher up, the walls narrowed and the architecture lost whatever human intention had shaped it, becoming something closer to geology — as if the mountain had grown the tower from its own bone. Birds didn't nest here. Nothing lived on these upper slopes that didn't have to. Torben — Stray, as some still called him — stood at the base and looked up at the tower disappearing into cloud. The cold had already found his fingers, his jaw, the gap at his collar where the wind threaded itself like a needle. He had been in worse places. Not many. They gathered in the courtyard, such as it was — a flat expanse of flagstone swept clean by the wind. Sable stood to his left, arms crossed, her jaw set. She hadn't spoken since the last ridge, and her silence had a texture to it — the kind that discouraged questions. Behind her, the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch — leaned on a broken wall and said nothing. His eyes moved, though. They tracked every shadow, every doorway, every place a man could hide or a wall could fall. Iselda waited near the gate, still as a statue, her pale features betraying nothing of the climb or the cold. Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless — had arrived before any of them, as if the mountain were a place he already knew. He stood with his hands folded inside his sleeves, his ashen eyes turned toward the Spire as though he could see something in it the rest of them could not. And there was one more: Captain Mettik, a human soldier who'd marched three days through the passes to meet them. He stood apart from the others, straight-backed, watching the Spire with the wary respect of a man who had seen buildings kill people. His boots were caked with ice and his cloak was torn at the shoulder, but he held himself like the march had been nothing. They descended into the Sanctum through a narrow stair that curled beneath the Spire's foundation. The steps were worn smooth by centuries of feet, and the walls pressed close — close enough that Grunn's shoulders scraped stone on both sides. The Sanctum was a chamber carved from the mountain's root — circular, low-ceilinged, the walls covered in carvings so old the stone had softened around them. Pillars braced the ceiling at intervals, squat and thick, and between them the carvings ran in unbroken bands — figures, symbols, scenes rendered in a style that predated any kingdom Torben knew by name. Dim light filtered through cracks in the rock above. The air smelled of wet stone and something older, something mineral and faintly sweet, like the breath of a cave that had been sealed for a long time. It was cold. Everything here was cold. Hemmen spoke first. He stood at the center of the chamber, one hand resting on the wall, and told them what the carvings meant. "The Riven War," he said. "A thousand years before the Felling. Queen Veredine — Veredine the Undying, an elf who commanded the living and the dead — she built this place as a seal. Her army, the Pallid Host, were the restless dead she had bound to her will. They did not tire. They did not question. They marched where she pointed and they consumed what stood in their path." His fingers found a groove in the stone — a long column of figures, some standing, some fallen. "When the war ended, she sealed them here. Entombed them beneath the mountain where the cold and the weight of the rock would hold them still." He traced a line across the stone with one finger. "Hatchwell — the town that stood at the mountain's base — burned. Nothing left. The Pallid Host marched through it on their way to this Spire, and there was nothing anyone could do. The people of Hatchwell had no warning. They woke to fire and the sound of the dead walking through their streets, and by morning the town was ash." The silence that followed was broken by footsteps. Osrik Pallengrave stepped into the Sanctum through an archway none of them had noticed. The Pale, they called him. He was a Tiefling — the horns swept back from his temples, black hair falling between them, red eyes catching what little light the chamber held. He was tall, lean in a way that suggested something stripped down rather than underfed, and he carried himself with the patience of someone who had learned that stillness unnerved people more than threats. He moved slowly, deliberately, as if he wanted them to see every part of him before he spoke. In his right hand he carried a blade: Harrowglass. An obsidian edge, dark as a closed eye, and Void-touched — the air around it dimmed, the light pulling toward the blade and vanishing. Some called it the Hungering Edge, and the name fit. It looked like it could eat the light from a room and still be hungry. Torben stepped forward. His green eyes met Osrik's red ones across the chamber. Neither moved. The distance between them was perhaps twenty paces, but the air in that gap felt heavier than it should have — dense, pressurized, as though the Sanctum itself were holding its breath. Behind Torben, Grunn was already reaching for what hung on the wall behind him — the Warden's Mail, silver chain that hummed with pale light when he donned it, settling over his shoulders with a weight that felt like purpose. The links caught the dim glow and threw it back against the walls. Captain Mettik's hand went to his sword, though he did not draw. Iselda shifted her weight — a small movement, almost invisible, but Torben had learned to read it. She was ready. The carvings on the walls seemed to shift in the changing light. Hemmen's voice rose. "The Binding of Reshkai — you know of it. What was sealed in The Hollow was one half of a lock. This Spire is the other." He looked at Osrik. "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago. But this — this was built to stop something older." Above them, mounted in an iron bracket near the ceiling, a bronze bell began to hum — the Nightbell, the bell that begins the Tithe of Echoes. The Tithe was a ritual older than the Spire itself, a tradition meant to keep the wards from failing. The bell's voice was low and long, and it filled the Sanctum the way water fills a bowl. The Watcher's Prophecy — carved into the foundation stone beneath their feet — spoke of a severing, a moment when the seals would thin and something would push through. Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade caught the Nightbell's resonance and the fire along its edge flared — brighter than Torben had seen it, brighter than Sable could control. She didn't look at the blade. She looked at Osrik. "Wren Hessik died at your hands," she said. Her voice was steady but her knuckles were white around the hilt. "And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast. You were there when the world caught fire." Osrik said nothing. The Hungering Edge moved slightly in his grip, as if it were breathing. The first strike came from the dark. Something fell from the ceiling — rubble, stone, a shower of dust that blinded everyone for half a breath. Chains rattled in the walls. The wind found its way into the Sanctum through cracks that hadn't been there a moment ago, carrying snow and the smell of old iron. Soldiers — unnamed, faceless, wearing armor that was more rust than steel — poured through the archway behind Osrik. They moved like men who had forgotten how to stop. Grunn met the first one with the Warden's Mail blazing and Burden still strapped to his back — then swung the great mace free and brought it down on a shield that split like kindling. Torben moved left. Sable moved right. Iselda was already gone — above them somewhere, a blur of white and translucent wing. Hemmen stood in the center of the chamber with his hands open and his ashen eyes closed, the Verity Beads clicking between his fingers, each bead catching a faint light of its own as they moved. The floor shook. Stones fell. A wooden beam cracked and swung loose from the ceiling, trailing dust. The Nightbell rang again — once, twice, a third time — and the carvings on the walls began to glow with a light that had been sleeping for a thousand years. The crumbling walls shed mortar like dead skin. An iron door at the far end of the Sanctum buckled inward. The torchlight guttered and died, and for a moment everything was dark except the fire on Kindling's edge and the pale glow of the Warden's Mail and the terrible, hungry absence of light around Harrowglass. Then the Spire shook to its roots, and the mountain answered. </text> Identify all factual violations in the text above that contradict the codex.

Model response

AI
<violation entry="101" detail="eyeColor" paragraph="2" substring="her brown eyes">The codex states Sable Dunmore has brown eyes, but the text describes "her brown eyes" which is correct? Wait, codex says Brown. So no violation? Actually text says "her brown eyes" — that matches codex eyeColor Brown. So no violation there. Let's list actual ones.</violation> Wait, need to check carefully. Paragraph 1: "The Spire of Echoes rose from the mountain's shoulder..." No named entities contradicted? Codex doesn't mention Spire of Echoes, but not covered? Actually not in codex, so ignore. Paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left..." Sable gender Female, correct. "her jaw set" correct. "Behind her, the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch — leaned..." Not in codex. "Iselda waited near the gate..." Not in codex. "Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless — had arrived..." Not in codex. "his ashen eyes turned toward..." Not contradicted? Codex doesn't mention Hemmen. "Captain Mettik, a human soldier..." Not in codex. So paragraph 2: check "Sable" details? Text: "Sable stood..." Codex: Sable Dunmore, Human, Female, age 28, eyeColor Brown, hairColor Auburn. Text doesn't mention hair or age or species, so no contradiction. Wait text in paragraph 8: "Sable drew Kindling..." That's okay. Wait paragraph 2 says "Sable stood to his left" — "his" refers to Torben (male), okay. But paragraph 2 mentions "Grunn" etc. Not in codex. Paragraph 3: "They descended into the Sanctum..." No contradictions with codex entries? Not named in codex except maybe locations? The Rusty Lantern, Dunmore. Not mentioned. Paragraph 4: "Hemmen spoke first..." He says "The Riven War... A thousand years before the Felling." Codex lore id 109: The Felling timePeriod Two centuries ago, category War. So "A thousand years before the Felling" is a date/relationship contradiction? The text says Riven War was a thousand years before the Felling. Codex doesn't specify Riven War, so not a contradiction of codex. But he says "Queen Veredine — Veredine the Undying, an elf..." Not in codex. "Hatchwell — the town..." Not in codex. Wait check paragraph 4: "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago." Let's check paragraph 8? Actually paragraph 8? Let's read text segments. Text paragraph 5? Actually the text is one block? Let's count paragraphs. The text has blank lines separating paragraphs. Let's identify paragraphs precisely. Paragraph 1: "The Spire of Echoes rose from the mountain's shoulder like a black tooth against the snow..." Paragraph 2: "They gathered in the courtyard... Captain Mettik..." Paragraph 3: "They descended into the Sanctum..." Paragraph 4: "Hemmen spoke first... Nothing left. The Pallid Host marched..." Wait actually there might be more paragraphs. Let's split by blank lines. Looking at text: 1. "The Spire of Echoes rose..." 2. "They gathered in the courtyard..." 3. "They descended into the Sanctum..." 4. "Hemmen spoke first..." 5. "The silence that followed was broken by footsteps." 6. "Osrik Pallengrave stepped into the Sanctum..." 7. "Torben stepped forward..." 8. "The carvings on the walls seemed to shift..." 9. "Sable drew Kindling..." So paragraph numbers: 1: Spire... 2: They gathered... 3: They descended... 4: Hemmen spoke... 5: The silence... 6: Osrik Pallengrave... 7: Torben stepped forward... 8: The carvings... 9: Sable drew Kindling... Now check each named entity in text against codex. Codex entries: 100 Torben Reikhart (aliases Stray): gender Male, eyeColor Green, hairColor Silver. 101 Sable Dunmore: species Human, gender Female, age 28, eyeColor Brown, hairColor Auburn. 102 Old Rivka: gender Female. 103 Petal Dunmore: gender Female. 104 Jurren Dunmore: gender Male. 105 The Rusty Lantern. 106 Dunmore: terrain Coastal. 107 Kindling: material Dark iron, objectType Weapon, power Fire. 108 Petal's Locket: material Silver, objectType Jewelry. 109 The Felling: timePeriod Two centuries ago, category War. 110 The Kindling Rite: category Tradition. Now check paragraph 2: "Torben — Stray, as some still called him — stood..." Codex: aliases Stray. Correct. "He had been in worse places." Not contradicted. "Sable stood to his left..." Okay. "Behind her, the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch..." Not in codex. "Iselda waited near the gate..." Not in codex. "Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless..." Not in codex. "And there was one more: Captain Mettik..." Not in codex. Check paragraph 6: "Osrik Pallengrave stepped into the Sanctum... The Pale, they called him. He was a Tiefling — the horns swept back..." Okay, not in codex. "In his right hand he carried a blade: Harrowglass." Not in codex (only Kindling, Petal's Locket). Check paragraph 7: "Torben stepped forward. His green eyes met Osrik's red ones..." Codex Torben eyeColor Green. Correct. "Behind Torben, Grunn was already reaching for what hung on the wall behind him — the Warden's Mail..." Not in codex. "Captain Mettik's hand went to his sword..." Okay. "Iselda shifted her weight... She was ready." Okay. Check paragraph 8: "Hemmen's voice rose... The Binding of Reshkai... This Spire is the other. He looked at Osrik. The Felling broke the world two centuries ago." Codex The Felling: timePeriod Two centuries ago. So "two centuries ago" matches. Good. "But this — this was built to stop something older." Okay. "Above them, mounted in an iron bracket near the ceiling, a bronze bell began to hum — the Nightbell, the bell that begins the Tithe of Echoes. The Tithe was a ritual older than the Spire itself, a tradition meant to keep the wards from failing." Codex 110 The Kindling Rite category Tradition. The text mentions "The Tithe of Echoes" and "Tithe was a ritual... a tradition". Not contradicting Kindling Rite? Not named same, but is there contradiction with item or lore? Not direct. "The Watcher's Prophecy — carved into the foundation stone..." Not in codex. Check paragraph 9: "Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade caught the Nightbell's resonance and the fire along its edge flared..." Codex Kindling: material Dark iron, objectType Weapon, power Fire. Text says "dark iron blade" and "fire along its edge". Correct. "Wren Hessik died at your hands," she said. "And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember..." Codex 103 Petal Dunmore gender Female. 101 Sable Dunmore. So Petal is sister of Sable. Not contradicted. "You were there when The Felling reached the coast." Codex 106 Dunmore terrain Coastal. So "reached the coast" matches Dunmore being coastal? Actually it says The Felling reached the coast. Dunmore is coastal. Not necessarily contradiction. "You were there when the world caught fire." Okay. Wait need to check paragraph 2 again: "The cold had already found his fingers..." "He" refers to Torben male. Correct. But wait paragraph 7 mentions "Torben stepped forward. His green eyes..." That matches green. Wait check paragraph 6: "Osrik Pallengrave... He was a Tiefling — the horns swept back from his temples, black hair falling between them, red eyes..." Not contradicted. Now check for contradictions with item 108 Petal's Locket: material Silver, objectType Jewelry. Is there mention? No. Check location 106 Dunmore: terrain Coastal. Paragraph 9 mentions "The Felling reached the coast." That aligns, not contradiction. Check location 105 The Rusty Lantern: not mentioned. Check character 102 Old Rivka: gender Female. Not mentioned in text (except maybe not present). Check character 103 Petal Dunmore: gender Female. In paragraph 9: "And before her — Petal. My sister." So Petal is sister, gender implied? Not contradicted. But wait text says "Petal. My sister." Codex Petal Dunmore gender Female. So consistent. Check character 104 Jurren Dunmore: gender Male. Not mentioned. Wait, is there any contradiction about hair color? Codex Torben hairColor Silver. Text doesn't mention Torben's hair. Codex Sable hairColor Auburn. Text doesn't mention hair color for Sable. But wait paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left... her jaw set." No hair. What about eye colors? Paragraph 7: "His green eyes" — Torben green, correct. "Osrik's red ones" — not in codex. Wait check paragraph 4: "Queen Veredine... an elf..." Not contradicted. But wait paragraph 9 mentions "Sable drew Kindling... The dark iron blade..." Codex says material Dark iron. Good. "fire along its edge flared — brighter than Torben had seen it..." Codex power Fire. Good. Now check for contradictions in naming: "Grunn — Old Tetch" vs "Old Rivka" (id 102). Not same. Wait is there a contradiction with the Warden's Mail? Not in codex. But let's check paragraph 3: "The Sanctum was a chamber carved from the mountain's root — circular, low-ceilinged..." Not contradicted. Wait check paragraph 2: "They gathered in the courtyard, such as it was — a flat expanse of flagstone swept clean by the wind." Not contradicted. Actually I need to be more meticulous: check every named entity, physical description, location detail, date, title, relationship mentioned. Let's list all named entities in text: Spire of Echoes (not in codex) Torben (id 100) - mentioned correctly with alias Stray, green eyes. Sable (id 101) - mentioned. Need to check if any detail wrong. Paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left..." Paragraph 9: "Sable drew Kindling... Her voice was steady..." No wrong details mentioned except maybe eye color? Wait paragraph 2 doesn't mention her eyes. But wait in paragraph 7? No. Grunn / Old Tetch (not in codex) Iselda (not in codex) Brother Hemmen / the Eyeless (not in codex) Captain Mettik (not in codex) Sanctum (not in codex? Actually not listed in codex locations. Only The Rusty Lantern and Dunmore.) Hemmen (not in codex) Riven War (not in codex) Veredine the Undying (not in codex) Queen Veredine (not in codex) Pallid Host (not in codex) Hatchwell (not in codex) Osrik Pallengrave (not in codex) The Pale (not in codex) Tiefling (species, not contradicted since not in codex for Osrik) Harrowglass (not Kindling? Wait Harrowglass is different item. Codex has Kindling id 107. So Harrowglass is a different item, not contradicted unless text says it's Kindling. Text says "In his right hand he carried a blade: Harrowglass." So that's fine, it's a different blade.) Hungering Edge (nickname for Harrowglass?) Warden's Mail (not in codex) Burden (not in codex, but it's a great mace) Nightbell (not in codex) Tithe of Echoes (not in codex, but codex has Kindling Rite. Not same name, not contradiction.) The Binding of Reshkai (not in codex) The Hollow (not in codex) The Watcher's Prophecy (not in codex) Wren Hessik (not in codex) Petal (id 103) - mentioned as sister. Gender Female in codex. Text: "Petal. My sister." That implies female? Not contradicted. But wait is there any detail? No. The Felling (id 109) - mentioned in paragraph 4? Actually paragraph 8? Let's check exactly where "The Felling" appears. In paragraph 5? Actually let's map paragraphs precisely with content. Let's re-split carefully based on blank lines in the text block: Text block: "The Spire of Echoes rose... Nothing lived on these upper slopes that didn't have to. Torben — Stray, as some still called him — stood at the base..." Then blank line? Actually in the given text, there are line breaks? Let's examine the raw text. The text starts: "The Spire of Echoes rose from the mountain's shoulder like a black tooth against the snow. It was a fortress — had always been a fortress, even before the wars had given it purpose. The mountain terrain was brutal here: sheer rock faces, ice in the crevices, a wind that cut through wool and leather alike. Frost coated every surface. The stone was dark and slick with it. Higher up, the walls narrowed and the architecture lost whatever human intention had shaped it, becoming something closer to geology — as if the mountain had grown the tower from its own bone. Birds didn't nest here. Nothing lived on these upper slopes that didn't have to. Torben — Stray, as some still called him — stood at the base and looked up at the tower disappearing into cloud. The cold had already found his fingers, his jaw, the gap at his collar where the wind threaded itself like a needle. He had been in worse places. Not many." Then blank line? Actually in the prompt, there's a blank line between paragraphs? Let's check the formatting. The text is given as a block with paragraphs separated by blank lines? Looking at the prompt: "The Spire of Echoes rose... Not many. They gathered in the courtyard... watching the Spire with the wary respect..." Yes, blank line separates. Next: "They descended into the Sanctum... sealed for a long time. It was cold. Everything here was cold." Next blank line. "Hemmen spoke first... and by morning the town was ash." Next blank line. "The silence that followed was broken by footsteps. Osrik Pallengrave stepped... and still be hungry." Next blank line? Actually "Torben stepped forward..." might be next paragraph. Let's parse with explicit paragraph breaks (double newlines): Paragraph 1: "The Spire of Echoes rose... Not many." Paragraph 2: "They gathered in the courtyard... watching the Spire with the wary respect..." Paragraph 3: "They descended into the Sanctum... Everything here was cold." Paragraph 4: "Hemmen spoke first... by morning the town was ash." Paragraph 5: "The silence that followed was broken by footsteps." Paragraph 6: "Osrik Pallengrave stepped... still be hungry." Paragraph 7: "Torben stepped forward... was ready." Paragraph 8: "The carvings on the walls... push through." Paragraph 9: "Sable drew Kindling... and the mountain answered." So that's correct. Now check paragraph 8: "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago." Codex: The Felling timePeriod Two centuries ago. So correct. "But this — this was built to stop something older." Okay. "Above them... The Tithe was a ritual older than the Spire itself, a tradition meant to keep the wards from failing." Codex 110: The Kindling Rite category Tradition. Not mentioned here, but "The Tithe of Echoes" is a different tradition. Not a contradiction since codex doesn't say there's only one tradition. Wait check paragraph 9: "Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade caught... fire along its edge flared..." Correct. But wait there might be contradictions I missed. Let's examine every physical description mentioned for characters in codex. Torben: gender Male, eyeColor Green, hairColor Silver. Text paragraph 1: "Torben — Stray..." Gender implied male? "his fingers, his jaw". Correct. "His green eyes" in paragraph 7. Correct. Hair color not mentioned, so no contradiction. Sable: species Human, gender Female, age 28, eyeColor Brown, hairColor Auburn. Text paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left..." Gender? Not explicit but "her jaw set" in paragraph 2? Wait paragraph 2 says: "Sable stood to his left, arms crossed, her jaw set." Yes, "her" implies female. Good. Age not mentioned. Eye color: paragraph 2? No. Wait paragraph 9: "She didn't look at the blade. She looked at Osrik. 'Wren Hessik died...'" No eye color mentioned. Hair color: not mentioned. Species: not mentioned. So no contradiction? Wait but I need to check if text mentions brown hair or something. No. But wait in paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left, arms crossed, her jaw set. She hadn't spoken..." Okay. Petal Dunmore: gender Female. Text paragraph 9: "And before her — Petal. My sister." So sister of Sable (female). Consistent. Jurren Dunmore: gender Male. Not mentioned. Old Rivka: gender Female. Text mentions "Old Rivka"? No, text mentions "Old Tetch" for Grunn. Not Rivka. Now check locations: The Rusty Lantern (id 105) not mentioned. Dunmore (id 106) terrain Coastal. Text mentions "The Felling reached the coast." But Dunmore is the location, not mentioned by name except? Wait is "Dunmore" mentioned in text? No! The text mentions "Dunmore" nowhere? Actually wait let's check. The text mentions "Dunmore"? I don't see it. So no contradiction. But wait "Dunmore" is in the codex as a location with coastal terrain. The text mentions "reached the coast" but doesn't name Dunmore. So no contradiction. Items: Kindling (107): material Dark iron, objectType Weapon, power Fire. Text: "Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade... fire along its edge flared..." Correct. Petal's Locket (108): material Silver, objectType Jewelry. Not mentioned in text. Lore: The Felling (109): timePeriod Two centuries ago, category War. Text paragraph 8: "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago." Time period matches. Category? Not mentioned, but "broke the world" could be consistent with War? Not contradicted. The Kindling Rite (110): category Tradition. Not mentioned by that name in text. The text mentions "The Kindling Rite"? No. It mentions "Kindling" the blade. So no contradiction. Wait, but there might be hidden contradictions. Let's check paragraph 6: "In his right hand he carried a blade: Harrowglass. An obsidian edge, dark as a closed eye, and Void-touched..." Codex item 107 Kindling is Dark iron, Weapon, Fire. Harrowglass is obsidian, Void-touched. So not Kindling. But is there a contradiction that Kindling should be dark iron but they call it Harrowglass? No, Sable draws Kindling in paragraph 9. So Kindling is separate. Wait check paragraph 7: "the Warden's Mail, silver chain..." Not in codex. Check paragraph 7: "Burden still strapped to his back — then swung the great mace free..." Not in codex. Check paragraph 9: "The Verity Beads clicking between his fingers..." Not in codex. So far I haven't found any violations? That can't be right; usually there are some. Let's re-read very carefully for any swapped details. Wait paragraph 2: "The mountain terrain was brutal here..." Codex location 106 Dunmore terrain Coastal. But this is "The Spire of Echoes" on a mountain, not Dunmore. So no contradiction. Wait check paragraph 9: "Sable drew Kindling..." Codex says Kindling material Dark iron. Text says "dark iron blade". Good. But wait in paragraph 9: "Wren Hessik died at your hands," she said. "And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast. You were there when the world caught fire." Is there any contradiction about relationships? Codex 101 Sable Dunmore, 103 Petal Dunmore. They share surname Dunmore, so sisters. Good. Wait check paragraph 1: "Torben — Stray, as some still called him — stood at the base..." Codex 100 name Torben Reikhart aliases Stray. Good. But wait in paragraph 7: "Torben stepped forward. His green eyes met Osrik's red ones across the chamber." Codex Torben eyeColor Green. Correct. Is there any contradiction with gender? "Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless" — Hemmen is male? Not in codex. Wait, I might have missed something about Old Rivka. The text mentions "Old Tetch" but codex has "Old Rivka" (id 102). Are they the same? No, "Old Rivka" is a different name. But the text doesn't mention Old Rivka, so no contradiction. But wait: The text mentions "Grunn — Old Tetch — leaned on a broken wall..." Could "Old Tetch" be a contradiction with "Old Rivka"? No, they are different characters. Wait, check paragraph 8: "The Watcher's Prophecy — carved into the foundation stone beneath their feet — spoke of a severing..." Not in codex. Actually, let me check if there's a contradiction in the material of Petal's Locket being mentioned somewhere. No. Wait, is there a contradiction with the date? The Felling is "Two centuries ago" in codex. The text says in paragraph 4? Actually paragraph 4 is Hemmen speaking about Riven War being "A thousand years before the Felling." That doesn't contradict the codex about The Felling being two centuries ago, unless it's implied that The Felling was two centuries ago and Riven War was 1000 years before that, which is fine. But wait paragraph 8 says "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago." That matches. Now check if there's any contradiction about the location "Dunmore". The text mentions "Dunmore" nowhere. So no. Wait, but I see: "Sable Dunmore" is in the codex. The text refers to her as "Sable". That's correct (first name). What about "Petal Dunmore"? The text refers to "Petal". Correct. Now check physical descriptions: Codex Sable hairColor Auburn. Does the text mention her hair? Let's check paragraph 2: "Sable stood to his left, arms crossed, her jaw set." No hair. Paragraph 9: "Sable drew Kindling... She didn't look at the blade. She looked at Osrik... her knuckles were white..." No hair. But wait paragraph 6 mentions Osrik's hair: "black hair falling between them". Not in codex. Wait, maybe there is a contradiction with eye color of Sable? Let's check paragraph 2 again carefully: "Sable stood to his left, arms crossed, her jaw set. She hadn't spoken since the last ridge, and her silence had a texture to it — the kind that discouraged questions. Behind her, the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch — leaned on a broken wall and said nothing. His eyes moved, though. They tracked every shadow..." No mention of Sable's eyes. Wait, but paragraph 7 mentions "His green eyes" for Torben. Good. Is there any contradiction with the item "Kindling" being used by Sable? Codex doesn't specify user, so fine. Wait, check paragraph 9: "The dark iron blade caught the Nightbell's resonance and the fire along its edge flared — brighter than Torben had seen it, brighter than Sable could control." Codex Kindling power Fire. So fire flaring is consistent. But wait, the text says "Sable could control" — not contradicted. Actually, I think there might be a contradiction that I missed in paragraph 6: "He was a Tiefling — the horns swept back from his temples, black hair falling between them, red eyes catching what little light the chamber held." This is Osrik. Not in codex, so okay. Wait, check paragraph 5: "The silence that followed was broken by footsteps." Not contradicted. Let's check paragraph 3: "The steps were worn smooth by centuries of feet, and the walls pressed close — close enough that Grunn's shoulders scraped stone on both sides." Okay. Could there be a contradiction about "The Rusty Lantern" being mentioned? No, it's not in the text. Wait, I need to check every named entity in the text against codex, even those not in codex? The instruction says: "Check every named entity, physical description, location detail, date, title, and relationship mentioned in the text against the codex." So if something is not in the codex, I don't flag it unless it contradicts something that is? For example, if the codex says Dunmore is coastal and the text says Dunmore is inland. But Dunmore isn't mentioned. But wait, there is "The Felling reached the coast" and Dunmore is coastal. That doesn't contradict. Wait, is "The Spire of Echoes" in the codex? No. So ignore. But let me check the text for any mention of "Dunmore" hidden? "Sable Dunmore" is mentioned? Actually the text only says "Sable". Not "Sable Dunmore". So the surname is not mentioned in text. Wait, check paragraph 9: "Wren Hessik died... And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember... You were there when The Felling reached the coast. You were there when the world caught fire." This mentions "the coast" and "The Felling". Codex The Felling is War, Two centuries ago. The text implies The Felling was a catastrophic event that reached the coast and caught fire. Not contradictory. But wait, there's a contradiction with "The Kindling Rite". The text mentions "The Tithe of Echoes" and "The Nightbell... begins the Tithe of Echoes. The Tithe was a ritual older than the Spire itself, a tradition..." Codex 110 is "The Kindling Rite" category Tradition. The text doesn't mention Kindling Rite at all. But is there an implicit contradiction? No. Wait, I should check if any character's gender is wrong in text. For example, "Old Rivka" is female in codex, but the text mentions "Old Tetch" who is a dwarf male? Not in codex. Actually, I realize now: The text mentions "Grunn — Old Tetch". The codex has "Old Rivka" (id 102) with gender Female. The nickname "Old" is used for both "Old Rivka" and "Old Tetch". But that's not a contradiction unless they are the same person. The text doesn't mention Rivka. But wait, the text mentions "Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless — had arrived... his ashen eyes..." Wait! "the Eyeless" but "his ashen eyes turned toward..." That is a contradiction within the text, but not with the codex (since Hemmen is not in codex). So don't flag. Wait, check paragraph 6: "Osrik Pallengrave... He was a Tiefling... In his right hand he carried a blade: Harrowglass." Then paragraph 9: "The terrible, hungry absence of light around Harrowglass." Okay. Now, is there any contradiction with item 108? The text mentions "Petal's Locket"? No. Wait, I think I need to check if "Sable" is referred to as human? The text doesn't specify her species, but codex says Human. Not contradicted. But wait! Paragraph 2: "Captain Mettik, a human soldier..." So "human" is used for Mettik. Not contradicted. Wait, I might have missed a contradiction in paragraph 7: "Behind Torben, Grunn was already reaching for what hung on the wall behind him — the Warden's Mail, silver chain that hummed with pale light when he donned it..." Not in codex. Let's check paragraph 4: "The Riven War... A thousand years before the Felling." Codex says The Felling was Two centuries ago. So Riven War was 1000 years before that, i.e., 1200 years ago. Not contradicted. But wait, Hemmen says "The Riven War... A thousand years before the Felling. Queen Veredine — Veredine the Undying, an elf who commanded the living and the dead — she built this place as a seal. Her army, the Pallid Host, were the restless dead she had bound to her will." Then later: "The Felling broke the world two centuries ago. But this — this was built to stop something older." Wait, there's a contradiction in timeline? The Spire was built by Queen Veredine during/after Riven War, which was 1000 years before The Felling (two centuries ago). So the Spire was built about 1200 years ago. Then Hemmen says "this was built to stop something older" — older than The Felling (200 years ago), which is true (1200 years is older). So consistent. But wait, the text says "The carvings... predated any kingdom Torben knew by name." Not contradicted. Actually, I think there are no violations? But the prompt asks to identify every factual inconsistency. Maybe there are indeed none? Let's not invent any. But wait, I need to check the substring for "brown hair" or something. Let's read paragraph 2 very carefully: "Sable stood to his left, arms crossed, her jaw set. She hadn't spoken since the last ridge, and her silence had a texture to it — the kind that discouraged questions. Behind her, the dwarf Grunn — Old Tetch — leaned on a broken wall and said nothing. His eyes moved, though. They tracked every shadow, every doorway, every place a man could hide or a wall could fall. Iselda waited near the gate, still as a statue, her pale features betraying nothing of the climb or the cold. Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless — had arrived before any of them, as if the mountain were a place he already knew. He stood with his hands folded inside his sleeves, his ashen eyes turned toward the Spire as though he could see something in it the rest of them could not. And there was one more: Captain Mettik, a human soldier who'd marched three days through the passes to meet them. He stood apart from the others, straight-backed, watching the Spire with the wary respect of a man who had seen buildings kill people. His boots were caked with ice and his cloak was torn at the shoulder, but he held himself like the march had been nothing." Wait! "Brother Hemmen — the Eyeless — ... his ashen eyes turned toward..." The nickname "Eyeless" but he has eyes ("ashen eyes"). This is an internal contradiction, but Hemmen is not in the codex. So not flagged. But wait, "Iselda waited near the gate, still as a statue, her pale features..." Not contradicted. Let's check paragraph 9 for "Kindling" details: "Sable drew Kindling. The dark iron blade caught the Nightbell's resonance and the fire along its edge flared — brighter than Torben had seen it, brighter than Sable could control. She didn't look at the blade. She looked at Osrik. 'Wren Hessik died at your hands,' she said. Her voice was steady but her knuckles were white around the hilt. 'And before her — Petal. My sister. You remember, don't you? You were there when The Felling reached the coast. You were there when the world caught fire.' Osrik said nothing. The Hungering Edge moved slightly in his grip, as if it were breathing." Wait, is there a contradiction with "My sister" referring to Petal? Codex has Petal Dunmore and Sable Dunmore. They share surname, so likely sisters. No contradiction. But wait, the codex lists "Petal Dunmore" gender Female. The text says "Petal. My sister." That is consistent. Actually, I just realized: The codex entry for "Old Rivka" (id 102) is gender Female. The text mentions "Old Tetch" but not Rivka. However, could "Old Tetch" be "Old Rivka" misnamed? No, the instruction is to flag direct contradictions. If the text mentions a different name, that's not necessarily a contradiction of the codex entry unless the codex says that person has a different name. But the codex entry is "Old Rivka" and the text mentions "Old Tetch" — they could be different people. So not a contradiction. Wait, but check paragraph 7: "Grunn was already reaching for what hung on the wall behind him — the Warden's Mail, silver chain that hummed with pale light when he donned it, settling over his shoulders with a weight that felt like purpose. The links caught the dim glow and threw it back against the walls. Captain Mettik's hand went to his sword, though he did not draw. Iselda shifted her weight — a small movement, almost invisible, but Torben had learned to read it. She was ready." No contradictions. Wait, I think there might actually be zero violations. But usually in these tasks there is at least one. Let me check every word against the codex. Codex: - Torben Reikhart: Male, Green eyes, Silver hair, alias Stray. Text: "Torben — Stray, as some still called him" correct. "His green eyes" correct. Hair not mentioned. - Sable Dunmore: Human, Female, 28, Brown eyes, Auburn hair. Text: "Sable" correct gender (her). Species not mentioned. Age not mentioned. Eyes: not mentioned? Wait, is "her jaw set" and "her knuckles" but no eye color. Hair: not mentioned. So no contradiction. But wait! In paragraph 9: "Sable drew Kindling... her voice was steady but her knuckles were white around the hilt." No hair. Wait, is there a mention of "brown eyes" somewhere? Let's search the text for "brown". The text has: "Her brown eyes"? No, I don't see "brown" in the text except maybe? Let's check the text: "The stone was dark... His eyes moved... His ashen eyes... red eyes... His green eyes... her pale features... her knuckles were white..." No "brown". So Sable's eye color is not mentioned in text, so no contradiction. Wait, but what about "Auburn" hair? Not mentioned. So indeed, there might be zero violations. But I should check if "The Felling" is described as reaching the coast, and Dunmore is coastal. That's consistent. But wait! There's a contradiction about "Kindling Rite". The text mentions "The Nightbell... begins the Tithe of Echoes. The Tithe was a ritual older than the Spire itself, a tradition meant to keep the wards from failing." The codex has "The Kindling Rite" with category Tradition. The text mentions "The Kindling Rite"? No. So no contradiction. Wait, but the item is "Kindling" (weapon). The text mentions "Sable drew Kindling". That's correct. Let's check if there's any contradiction with "Petal's Locket". The text mentions "Petal" but not the locket. Actually, I think I need to output <violations-none/> if there are truly none. But let me check one more time for subtle ones. Paragraph 1: "The mountain terrain was brutal here..." Codex location 106 Dunmore has terrain Coastal. But the text is describing a mountain (Spire of Echoes). It's not Dunmore. So no contradiction. Wait, the text mentions "Dunmore" in the name "Sable Dunmore" and "Petal Dunmore"? Actually the text never uses the surname "Dunmore"! Let's check: The text says "Sable" and "Petal". It doesn't say "Dunmore". So no location conflict. But wait, "Jurren Dunmore" is in codex but not in text. So I think there are indeed no contradictions between the text and the codex. However, I want to be absolutely sure. Let's examine the text for any mention of "silver". The text mentions "silver chain" for Warden's Mail. Codex has Petal's Locket material Silver. Not related. The text mentions "obsidian edge" for Harrowglass. Codex Kindling material Dark iron. Not same item. The text mentions "bronze bell" - Nightbell. Not in codex. The text mentions "iron bracket". Not contradicted. The text mentions "wooden beam". Not contradicted. The text mentions "iron door". Not contradicted. So yes, I believe there are no violations. But wait! I just noticed: In paragraph 6, "Osrik Pallengrave stepped into the Sanctum... He was a Tiefling — the horns swept back from his temples, black hair falling between them, red eyes catching what little light the chamber held." Then in paragraph 7: "Torben stepped forward. His green eyes met Osrik's red ones across the chamber." Then in paragraph 9: "The terrible, hungry absence of light around Harrowglass." All fine. Wait, is there a contradiction in paragraph 4: "Queen Veredine — Veredine the Undying, an elf..." Not in codex. But actually, I need to check if the codex mentions anything about "The Felling" being a war. Yes, category War. The text says "The Felling broke the world" and "when The Felling reached the coast" and "when the world caught fire". That sounds like a catastrophic event, possibly a war. Not contradicted. Therefore, my answer is <violations-none/>.<|end_message|><violations-none/><|end_message|>
created_at"2026-07-25T14:52:57.932Z" 7/25/2026, 2:52:57 PM
model"thinkingmachines/inkling-20260715"
app_id182717
external_user(null)
streamedtrue
cancelledfalse
latency4794
moderation_latency(null)
generation_time845377
tokens_prompt2977
tokens_completion8681
native_tokens_prompt2716
native_tokens_completion8308
native_tokens_completion_images(null)
native_tokens_reasoning0
native_tokens_cached672
num_media_prompt(null)
num_input_audio_prompt(null)
num_media_completion0
num_search_results(null)
num_fetches(null)
web_search_engine(null)
origin"https://ncbench.com/"
is_byokfalse
finish_reason"stop"
native_finish_reason"stop"
service_tier(null)
usage0.03580564
router(null)
provider_responses
0
endpoint_id"d6b9d68e-115a-49d7-81cd-1ad1c6942b0e"
id"chatcmpl-RqmevnWSRhnQkFkvudkpFvNu"
is_byokfalse
latency68
model_permaslug"thinkingmachines/inkling-20260715"
provider_name"DeepInfra"
status200
user_agent"langchainjs-openai/1.0.0 ((node/v24.18.0; linux; x64))"
http_referer(null)
request_id"req-1784991177-0VQgQxUnrcUkUxkdb2R0"
session_id(null)
preset_id(null)
api_type"completions"
id"gen-1784991177-hB0LNEEyx9z5nFzmM6vW"
upstream_id"chatcmpl-RqmevnWSRhnQkFkvudkpFvNu"
total_cost0.03580564
cache_discount0.00055776
upstream_inference_cost0
provider_name"DeepInfra"
response_cache_source_id(null)
data_region"global"

Evaluation details

Result Evaluator Details Meta Data
50.00% Correct "no violations" response
Response should contain <violations-none/> or equivalent phrasing
hasViolationTagstrue
hasViolationsNoneTagtrue
50.00% No hallucinated violations
Response must not contain any <violation> tags
hasViolationTagstrue
responseLength34042
violationCount1
50.0000%