Anthropic

Comparing 21 models from Anthropic.

Model Total ▼ Released Context CoTTooling Creative Writing Language Utility Reasoning Text Editing Rule Following Hallucination
Claude Opus 5.5 (Reasoning)96.43%Sep 21, 261m✓100.00%91.10%99.76%98.84%95.45%98.60%90.06%97.63%
Claude Opus 4.6 (Reasoning)95.06%Feb 4, 261m✓100.00%84.55%96.12%98.93%93.19%98.86%89.78%99.06%
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Reasoning)93.64%Feb 17, 261m✓100.00%83.09%97.58%97.88%89.61%98.30%85.73%96.98%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Reasoning)92.77%Sep 28, 261m✓100.00%90.33%96.13%94.61%92.69%98.21%74.05%96.09%
Claude Opus 4.7 (Reasoning)92.53%Apr 16, 261m✓100.00%84.73%98.77%97.87%88.52%97.58%74.04%98.69%
Claude Opus 4.8 (Reasoning)92.33%May 27, 261m✓99.53%85.25%96.38%99.26%91.76%98.78%70.27%97.41%
Claude Opus 4.692.31%Feb 4, 261m–100.00%83.59%96.13%90.72%89.75%98.35%83.11%96.80%
Claude Opus 5 (Reasoning, Low)92.06%Jul 24, 261m✓99.75%88.87%99.46%92.75%88.95%96.99%72.36%97.34%
Claude Opus 4.8 (Reasoning, Low)91.89%May 27, 261m✓99.48%85.86%96.31%98.00%88.83%98.71%70.56%97.33%
Claude Opus 5 (Reasoning)91.15%Jul 24, 261m✓99.58%88.64%99.37%93.39%85.32%96.91%69.11%96.86%
Claude Sonnet 4.690.66%Feb 17, 261m–100.00%83.31%100.00%88.52%79.62%96.37%82.50%94.99%
Claude Sonnet 5 (Reasoning)90.40%Jun 30, 261m✓99.17%81.31%99.04%92.87%87.77%97.89%68.34%96.77%
Claude Sonnet 5 (Reasoning, Low)90.16%Jun 30, 261m✓99.52%81.43%98.06%93.53%87.78%97.93%66.62%96.44%
Claude Opus 589.97%Jul 24, 261m–99.77%88.13%99.73%90.50%85.64%98.06%64.01%93.91%
Claude Opus 4.789.90%Apr 16, 261m–99.48%84.74%92.32%95.77%88.29%97.55%68.08%92.95%
Claude Opus 4.589.60%Nov 24, 25200k–100.00%81.71%99.66%89.84%84.25%97.69%72.61%91.03%
Claude Sonnet 487.64%May 22, 25200k–100.00%79.21%91.31%84.02%75.86%99.13%81.52%90.04%
Claude Sonnet 4.587.54%Sep 29, 251m–97.75%84.19%92.39%83.78%78.61%99.02%76.80%87.78%
Claude Sonnet 587.34%Jun 30, 261m–95.99%82.58%95.50%88.57%75.35%97.65%74.36%88.74%
Claude Opus 487.22%May 22, 25200k–100.00%83.79%93.01%88.81%76.72%97.25%70.37%87.84%
Claude Haiku 4.583.36%Oct 15, 25200k–96.75%78.96%91.84%72.48%67.77%96.81%70.35%91.93%
Model Performance
Cost vs Performance

Compares total benchmark cost against overall score for Anthropic models. Quadrant lines are drawn at the median values.

1 low-scoring outlier hidden: Claude Haiku 4.5 (83.4%).

Cost Breakdown

Total benchmark cost per model, broken down by input, reasoning, and output tokens. Toggle between USD and token views.