Structural Counting

Subcategory of Utility. 91 models scored.

Model Leaderboard

All models ranked by their Structural Counting subcategory score.

# Model Structural Counting Utility Overall
1 Claude Opus 4.6 (Reasoning) 100.00% 98.93% 95.02%
2 Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) 100.00% 99.91% 94.37%
3 Qwen 3.5 397B A17B 100.00% 97.50% 91.73%
4 Qwen 3.5 122B 100.00% 96.36% 91.53%
5 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 100.00% 96.63% 91.04%
6 Qwen 3.5 27B 100.00% 95.67% 90.85%
7 Gemini 3 Flash (Preview, Reasoning) 100.00% 97.20% 90.50%
8 Aion 2.0 100.00% 90.91% 89.21%
9 Gemini 3 Pro (Preview) 100.00% 96.14% 88.79%
10 Gemini 2.5 Pro 100.00% 92.18% 88.53%
11 Qwen 3.5 35B 100.00% 96.42% 88.00%
12 Qwen 3.5 Flash 100.00% 96.11% 86.38%
13 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Reasoning) 99.00% 97.88% 93.66%
14 Z.AI GLM 4.6 98.00% 88.58% 89.11%
15 o4 Mini High 97.50% 98.67% 90.29%
16 GPT-5.2 97.00% 96.22% 90.26%
17 Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (Reasoning) 96.50% 89.63% 85.75%
18 Z.AI GLM 5 95.00% 94.11% 91.23%
19 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B 94.50% 88.31% 74.70%
20 GPT-5 Mini 94.00% 98.39% 92.62%
21 Z.AI GLM 4.7 93.00% 94.31% 88.69%
22 o4 Mini 92.50% 96.31% 88.35%
23 GPT-5.1 91.50% 95.33% 92.54%
24 Minimax M2.5 90.50% 90.42% 88.71%
25 Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) 90.00% 82.25% 86.51%
26 Claude 3.5 Haiku 90.00% 82.57% 83.73%
27 ByteDance Seed 1.6 Flash 90.00% 84.16% 73.27%
28 Claude Opus 4 89.50% 88.81% 87.69%
29 Qwen 3.5 Plus (2026-02-15) 89.00% 86.65% 85.96%
30 GPT-4.1 85.50% 90.57% 88.68%
31 Grok 4 85.00% 89.67% 88.12%
32 GPT-5 Nano 85.00% 93.91% 82.60%
33 Z.AI GLM 4.5 83.00% 79.19% 86.27%
34 Writer: Palmyra X5 83.00% 79.71% 79.57%
35 Claude Sonnet 4 82.00% 84.02% 88.72%
36 Z.AI GLM 4.7 Flash 81.00% 88.98% 84.82%
37 ByteDance Seed 1.6 80.00% 90.83% 90.70%
38 DeepSeek-V2 Chat 79.50% 83.82% 84.83%
39 GPT-4o, May 13th (temp=0) 78.00% 83.13% 85.36%
40 Stealth: Aurora Alpha 77.00% 92.59% 83.79%
41 GPT-5 76.50% 93.53% 91.93%
42 Claude Sonnet 4.6 76.00% 88.52% 91.15%
43 Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 74.00% 80.14% 81.08%
44 Claude Opus 4.5 72.50% 89.84% 89.69%
45 Mistral Large 3 72.00% 84.91% 85.43%
46 Claude Haiku 4.5 70.50% 72.48% 85.14%
47 Claude Opus 4.6 70.00% 90.72% 92.35%
48 DeepSeek V3.2 70.00% 81.58% 82.25%
49 Mistral Large 69.50% 73.04% 80.15%
50 Gemma 3 12B 69.50% 79.28% 78.41%
51 Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.00% 83.78% 88.03%
52 Llama 3.1 70B 68.00% 81.03% 78.40%
53 Mistral Large 2 66.00% 69.19% 82.41%
54 GPT-4.1 Mini 65.50% 82.30% 83.20%
55 Grok 4.1 Fast 64.50% 84.12% 89.55%
56 Qwen 2.5 72B 64.00% 76.43% 75.46%
57 GPT-4o, May 13th (temp=1) 63.50% 80.69% 83.80%
58 DeepSeek V3 (2024-12-26) 62.50% 81.87% 83.68%
59 GPT-4o, Aug. 6th (temp=1) 60.50% 82.44% 82.62%
60 Ministral 3 8B 60.00% 74.43% 71.76%
61 GPT-4o, Aug. 6th (temp=0) 59.50% 82.11% 82.45%
62 DeepSeek V3.1 59.50% 76.65% 82.39%
63 Ministral 3 14B 55.50% 79.03% 72.54%
64 Mistral NeMO 54.50% 51.55% 65.04%
65 Gemini 2.5 Flash 54.00% 61.45% 80.60%
66 WizardLM 2 8x22b 53.50% 67.14% 71.07%
67 DeepSeek V3 (2025-03-24) 53.50% 80.62% 81.99%
68 GPT-4o Mini (temp=1) 53.00% 82.16% 79.08%
69 Hermes 3 70B 52.50% 61.15% 72.57%
70 GPT-4.1 Nano 52.50% 68.45% 71.94%
71 Mistral Small Creative 51.00% 76.28% 73.27%
72 Ministral 3 3B 50.00% 72.38% 67.22%
73 Arcee AI: Trinity Mini 49.50% 59.94% 70.90%
74 Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) 48.00% 86.39% 85.35%
75 Ministral 3B 47.50% 49.17% 61.29%
76 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 47.00% 62.54% 83.39%
77 Llama 3.1 8B 46.50% 74.82% 63.37%
78 GPT-4o Mini (temp=0) 45.00% 81.43% 78.29%
79 Arcee AI: Trinity Large (Preview) 44.50% 60.74% 73.33%
80 Claude 3 Haiku 44.50% 68.47% 71.19%
81 Rocinante 12B 43.50% 48.47% 54.55%
82 Gemma 3 27B 43.00% 76.82% 77.85%
83 Cohere Command R+ (Aug. 2024) 42.00% 59.51% 69.03%
84 Mistral Medium 3.1 39.00% 80.13% 77.83%
85 LFM2 24B 38.50% 69.48% 58.77%
86 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 37.00% 76.75% 84.24%
87 Hermes 3 405B 37.00% 69.02% 82.86%
88 Ministral 8B 33.50% 46.82% 64.87%
89 Grok 4 Fast 32.50% 76.76% 86.15%
90 Gemma 3 4B 31.00% 60.30% 68.57%
91 Mistral Small 3.2 24B 23.50% 73.17% 78.60%